Posts made in September 2024

Sankofa Café Owner: You’re Not a Special N-Word In The Room

Haile Gerima called me a “nigger” in front of a crowd of Black elders, Howard University students and professors. They clapped for him after the disinformation he spewed in anger about the history and story of Maroons. This happened at his establishment, Sankofa Café on Georgia Ave in DC during a talk on the book, I Am Maroon.

After sharing my views on the use of the term Maroon and that my tribal community does not use the term because of what it means, (run away slave) Haile Gerima made his way to the front of the room to speak on the issue and after a brief back and forth with me spewed angrily, “Don’t say you’re a special nigger in the middle of Negros. That’s brag language. You’re not special, you’re not special, you’re not special. What I’m trying to tell you is all Black people made history out of their circumstances.”

Haile Gerima during the Q&A: https://youtu.be/s5sHg_UQvmU

In spite of what I know, including the books I’ve read, as well as my lived experience, I was told to crawl back into my cave, slandered, dismissed and insulted when I spoke about the history, meaning and impact of the word Maroon on my Pamaka culture. I was speaking as a so-called Maroon from Suriname. During the Q&A session I applauded the two speakers, children of the late author, Russell Shoatz, a gang member who turned political activist after hearing Malcolm X speak. He was sentenced to life in prison “following a coordinated attack in Fairmont Park that left one park guard dead.” He was affectionately called Maroon for his attempts to break out of the prison walls that kept him away from his community, activism and the life he deserved to live if justice knew its way to him and all those marred in the ongoing freedom struggle for a just America.

My comment during the Q&A: https://youtu.be/WvQ4-bxQRpQ

Simply expressing my disgust, shock and dismay at being called “nigger” by the owner of Sankofa will not suffice this storytelling. Because something deeper, more meaningful, even eye-opening took place that Saturday evening at Sankofa, a place I had come to enjoy for its unique African celebrations and elevation of Black voices.

Haile Gerima, a stranger to me, was angry and hostile when he addressed me while speaking to the crowd that had gathered to listen to the book talk. He took issue with my earlier comment by covertly insulting me, followed by dismissing all I had shared,  even disregarding my lived experience and cultural knowledge and understanding of history and basic facts of Maroons. At one point he even unfurled a long list of supposed names used to describe Maroons. One of the words was Ifu Gadu Wani. I was shocked to see my tribal language on the list that seem to have been put together rather flimsily. I said “Ifu Gadu Wani” is my tribal language, Pamaka. I speak it, write it and know that it does not mean Maroon, nor has it ever been used as another word for Maroon. The phrase actually means God willing and literally, “If God wants.” I grew up in Suriname with my mother and elders saying this phrase all the time. Haile Gerima pumped with ego and adrenaline refused to listen. I even held up the book I brought along to offer as reference for this knowledge, The Maroons of Jamaica 1655-1796, A History of Resistance, Collaboration & Betrayal, by Mavis C. Cambell but it fell on deaf ears with a dismissive retort, “why do you think I don’t have that book!” Haile Gerima got so riled up he crouched like a wild beast readying to pounce its prey, leaned forward with hate-filled eyes and fire in his breath and said, “Don’t say you’re a special nigger in the middle of negros. That’s brag language. You’re not special, you’re not special, you’re not special!”

I never said I was a special “nigger” in the room. I simply said many of those who are called Maroons,  a name the British first called escaped enslaved Africans in Jamaica, do not refer to themselves as Maroons. Many of us come from different tribes and even speak different dialects and practice different tribal customs. We are Tribal African people, not Maroons.

I was shocked hearing “nigger” thrown at me so maliciously and flippantly. The word traveled in slow motion across this so-called sacred Black space called Sankofa.

Haile Gerima’s anger and toxic ego was on full display.  I don’t know Haile Gerima. Had never met or even heard of him before Saturday night at Sankofa. When I go to the Café it is usually for a topic I find interesting and meaningful to my own life and pursuit of storytelling and documenting.

During previous visits I spoke to several of the staff there who handled speaking events about having a talk on the word Maroon. I also wrote to them requesting the opportunity to speak about my I Am Not Your Maroon campaign to educate about the word that, similar to the word “nigger” also carries its own trauma and inhumanity for Tribal African people. They never took me up on the offer. However, when I saw that I Am Maroon was going to be a book talk, I didn’t hesitate to attend. I wanted to know more about the book and why the author called himself Maroon. I also wanted to engage them as an actual so-called Maroon.

I left Sankofa with a heavy heart and disappointed spirit. This so-called safe space for Black people and Black stories was not safe at all. That evening I experienced a café and book store that defended sharing misinformation and disinformation. And one led by a man who labelled me a bragger who sees herself as a “special nigger among negros” for not wanting to be called a Maroon… a run away slave.

After the event was over, I stayed seated for a few minutes gathering myself, my thoughts and my exit plan. As people made their way to the stage for signatures, an older gentleman came over to me and apologized for Haile Gerima’s behavior. He said it was uncalled for and told me briefly about his character and hot temper. It was the old excuse line, “this is who he is, he’s always like this and I’m sorry that happened to you.” As I made my way to the exit one of the HU professors came over to shake my hand and greet me because she had never met someone from Suriname before. In the small talks, I saw an opening. There, the moderator and a few other elders had circled around Haile Gerima. They were gleefully speaking and engaging, as if this man didn’t just call me a nigger in front of them. It was like the standing ovation Will Smith received at the Oscars after slapping Chris Rock for no good reason. During his tirade the old man threw an insincere and hallow apology my way, called me “sister” a few times and said we could speak further after the event because after all, he was happy to see a “sister” from Suriname at the event.

I quietly took my exit.

Sankofa on Georgia Ave in Washington, DC claims to hold sacred the stories and history of Black folks and their experience. Enter at your own risk though and never forget, “Don’t say you’re a special nigger in the middle of Negros. You’re not special.”

Campaigns to eliminate to use of the word Maroon to describe a People are not new. And neither is the hostility and push back against this long standing movement. And the pushback is not from white people, but from Black folks who are not called Maroons and burdened with the stigma it carries. This fight is no different than the one Malcolm X poignantly spoke of when he described the difference between the house Negro and the field Negro. And like Malcolm, I too am a field Negro. Just don’t call me Maroon. And if the great orator and writer James Baldwin can say to his American oppressors, I Am Not Your Negro, so too can Tribal Africans in the Americas say, I Am Not Your Maroon.

 

Jeanette Lenoir, Founder, ePluribusAmerica

Senators and Experts Challenge the Status Quo on American Health and Nutrition

In a groundbreaking roundtable discussion led by U.S. Senator Ron Johnson, a panel of experts convened to challenge the prevailing narratives surrounding American health and nutrition. The discussion, titled “American Health and Nutrition: A Second Opinion,” delved into the historical and foundational changes within the agriculture, food processing, and healthcare industries that have shaped the current state of national well-being.

The distinguished panel featured a diverse array of thought leaders, including medical professionals, psychologists, nutritionists, and food activists. Participants such as Dr. Casey Means, Dr. Jordan Peterson, Calley Means, Mikhaila Fuller, and Alex Clark shared their insights on the complex interplay between diet, lifestyle, and health outcomes.

Key themes emerged from the discussion, including the urgent need for greater transparency in the food industry, the dangers of processed foods and harmful additives, and the importance of embracing whole, nutrient-dense foods. The experts also highlighted the potential of personalized and preventative healthcare approaches, as well as the critical role of individual empowerment in achieving optimal health.

This roundtable discussion serves as a powerful reminder that the health of the nation is a multifaceted issue requiring a comprehensive and holistic approach. By fostering open dialogue and challenging conventional wisdom, we can pave the way for a healthier and more sustainable future for all Americans.

A Wake-Up Call for the American Healthcare System

Dr. Marty Makary’s speech at the Roundtable has ignited a firestorm of debate on social media, shedding light on the urgent need for reform within the American healthcare system. Dr. Makary, a renowned gastrointestinal surgeon, argues that the system is failing to address the root causes of chronic diseases, focusing instead on “billing and coding” and over-medication.

Key Points from Dr. Makary’s Speech

  • Focus on Profits Over Patients: Dr. Makary criticizes the healthcare industry for prioritizing profits over patient well-being. He highlights how various stakeholders, including pharmaceutical companies and insurance providers, are reaping enormous profits while patients suffer.
  • Environmental Factors and Chronic Diseases: Dr. Makary emphasizes the role of environmental factors, such as the quality of our food supply, in the alarming rise of chronic diseases. He argues that the healthcare system is neglecting these crucial factors, focusing instead on treating symptoms rather than preventing illness.
  • Over-Medication and Its Consequences: Dr. Makary expresses deep concern about the over-medication of Americans, particularly children. He links this trend to the deterioration of our food supply and the lack of focus on preventive measures.
  • The Need for Root Cause Analysis: Dr. Makary calls for a shift in focus towards addressing the root causes of chronic diseases. He advocates for research and initiatives that explore the impact of environmental factors, food quality, and lifestyle on health outcomes.

Call to Action

Dr. Makary’s speech serves as a powerful reminder that the American healthcare system is in dire need of reform. We must prioritize patient well-being, address the root causes of chronic diseases, and promote preventive measures. It is time to reimagine a healthcare system that truly cares for its citizens.

Full Roundtable Talk: https://rumble.com/v5fy7bv-american-health-and-nutrition-a-second-opinion.html

Dr. Marty Makary speech: https://x.com/newstart_2024/status/1838665564648280274

Vani Hari is another important voice in the fight for healthy foods for Americans. Hari is currently petitioning Kellogg to serve Americans the same cereals they offer other countries. You can find her on X: @thefoodbabe | Listen to Hari’s fiery call to action HERE.

A Historic Moment: NYC Mayor Eric Adams Faces Federal Indictment

In a shocking turn of events, New York City Mayor Eric Adams is facing a federal indictment and a possible 45 year prison sentence. This marks a historic moment as it’s a rare occurrence for a sitting mayor of such a prominent city to be indicted. The details of the indictment were just revealed, and the news has already sent ripples through the political landscape.

Historically, indictments of sitting mayors in NYC have been infrequent, with only a handful of cases in the city’s long history. This event could potentially have significant ramifications for the city’s governance and political future. As the legal proceedings unfold, the citizens of New York City will be closely watching how this situation develops and what it means for their city.

Potential ramifications of the indictment for the city’s governance and political future could include:

  • Political instability: The indictment could lead to a period of political instability, with potential power struggles and a loss of public trust in the city government.
  • Policy changes: Depending on the nature of the charges, the indictment could lead to a shift in policy priorities or a slowdown in decision-making.
  • Impact on future elections: The indictment could significantly impact future mayoral elections and the overall political landscape of the city.
  • Damage to the city’s reputation: The indictment could further tarnish the city’s reputation and affect its ability to attract businesses and investments.

    Mayor Adams’ response to the indictment is HERE.

    Eric Adams, a former police captain and Brooklyn borough president, was elected Mayor of New York City in 2021. He campaigned on a platform of public safety, economic recovery, and social justice, and has been a vocal advocate for police reform and addressing racial disparities. Adams, a Democrat, is known for his charismatic personality and outspoken style. Prior to his political career, he served in the New York City Transit Police and the New York City Police Department for over two decades.

    You can read the full grand jury indictment, United States of America v. Eric Adams, HERE.

    Tishomingo Public Schools Cancels Homecoming Amid Racism Storm

    Tishomingo Public Schools in Oklahoma has canceled its homecoming activities, including the football game, after a photo of six high school students displaying a racial slur surfaced on social media.

    The image, which depicts the students wearing Scrabble tiles to spell out the slur, quickly went viral, prompting widespread condemnation. Superintendent Brandon Moreland issued an apology and condemned the students’ actions, stating that “racism and discrimination, in any form, will never be tolerated or accepted on our campus.”

    The school district also cited “safety and security concerns” as a reason for canceling the homecoming events. This decision came after discussions with local law enforcement, highlighting the seriousness of the situation.

    While some community members on social media claimed the photo was taken as part of a spirit week activity where students were encouraged to wear Scrabble tiles, Moreland did not confirm or deny this in his statement. The school district has not yet responded to requests for further comment.

    Moreland emphasized the district’s commitment to fostering a safe and inclusive environment for all students. He stated that the school administration took swift disciplinary action and contacted the parents of the students involved. However, due to privacy laws, the specific details of the disciplinary measures remain confidential.

    This incident has sparked outrage and disappointment within the Tishomingo community. It serves as a stark reminder of the ongoing issue of racism and the importance of promoting respect and understanding in educational institutions.


    A History of Racism in American Schools: A Legacy of Segregation and Discrimination

    The history of racism in American schools is a long and complex one, deeply intertwined with the broader history of racial injustice in the United States. From the era of slavery through the Civil Rights Movement and beyond, schools have often been battlegrounds for racial equality, reflecting and reinforcing societal prejudices while also serving as crucibles for social change.

    Early Segregation and Discrimination:

    • Pre-Civil War: During the era of slavery, Black people were denied access to education. In the North, where slavery was not openly celebrated, Black schools were segregated and underfunded.
    • Post-Reconstruction: Following the Civil War, the Fourteenth Amendment guaranteed equal protection under the law, but de facto segregation remained deeply entrenched in American schools. Black schools were often inferior to white schools, with fewer resources and less qualified teachers.
    • Jim Crow Laws: The late 19th and early 20th centuries saw the rise of Jim Crow laws, which legalized racial segregation in all aspects of life, including education. Black students were forced to attend separate schools, which were often overcrowded and dilapidated.

    The Civil Rights Movement and Beyond:

    • Brown v. Board of Education: The landmark 1954 Supreme Court decision in Brown v. Board of Education declared racial segregation in public schools unconstitutional. This decision marked a turning point in the fight for racial equality in education, but the process of desegregation was slow and often met with resistance.
    • Desegregation Efforts: The decades following Brown v. Board saw a gradual increase in school desegregation, but progress was often uneven. Many districts resisted desegregation, and Black students continued to face discrimination and inequality in schools.
    • Contemporary Challenges: While significant progress has been made in desegregating schools, racial disparities in education persist. Black students are more likely to attend high-poverty schools with fewer resources and less qualified, and predominantly white teachers. They are also more likely to be suspended or expelled from school.

    The History of Racism:

    The history of racism in American schools continues to have a profound impact on Black students. They are more likely to experience discrimination, harassment, and microaggressions, which can negatively impact their academic performance and mental health. Addressing these issues requires a multi-pronged approach, including:

    • Implicit Bias Training: Educators need to be aware of their own implicit biases and how they can impact their interactions with students.
    • Culturally Responsive Pedagogy: Teachers should use teaching methods that are inclusive of all students’ cultures and backgrounds.
    • Diversity and Inclusion Initiatives: Schools need to hire more Black educators and create a welcoming and inclusive environment for all students, regardless of their race or ethnicity.

    The fight for racial equality in American schools is far from over. By acknowledging the history of racism in education and taking steps to address its ongoing terror, we can create a more just and equitable learning environment for all students, and severely punish those who participate in racial hatred.

    Additional Resources:

    Tennessee State University: A History of Underfunding an HBCU

    Tennessee State University (TSU) has a long and proud history as a Historically Black Land-Grant University (HBCU). However, this history is also marked by a legacy of underfunding by the state of Tennessee.

    Established in 1912, TSU was created as a result of the federal government’s decision to provide funding for separate land-grant colleges for Black students in states that maintained segregated higher education systems. While these land-grant schools were intended to receive “just and equitable” funding, TSU, like many other HBCUs, has consistently received far less state support than its predominantly white counterparts.

    This historical underfunding has had significant consequences for TSU. The university has been forced to operate with limited resources, impacting its ability to provide students with the same level of educational opportunities and facilities as other land-grant institutions.

    Recent studies have highlighted the extent of this underfunding. A 2021 analysis by the Tennessee Office of Legislative Budget Analysis found that the state’s failure to match federal research funds to TSU resulted in a shortfall of $151 million to $544 million since 1957. Furthermore, the Biden administration determined that Tennessee had underfunded TSU by a staggering $2.1 billion over the past 30 years, the highest amount of any state in the nation.

    While the state has recently allocated $250 million to TSU for infrastructure projects, this funding only begins to address the historical inequities faced by the university. TSU’s story serves as a powerful reminder of the ongoing impact of systemic racism and the urgent need for equitable funding for HBCUs across the country.

    US Support for Israel Harms National Security

    Josh Paul
    Former Director, U.S. Department of State.
    Senior Advisor at DAWN, (DAWN; Founded by Jamal Khashoggi in 2018, DAWN promotes democracy & human rights in the Middle East and North Africa).
    https://dawnmena.org/

    Current US policies towards Israel are damaging to our own national security. In addition to the harms our complicity in Israel’s war on Gaza has done (damaging our credibility, destabilizing the Middle East, increasing threats to our security and military forces, undermining of the rules-based international order to name a few), there are new and further risks resulting from Israel’s recent “pager” attacks in Lebanon.

    First, physically implanting explosives is much harder than implanting spyware and damaging malware. Given the integration of Israeli and U.S. tech sectors, this is something that should concern us all. To give just one example, as Eye on Surveillance describes, Israeli surveillance technology being integrated into US city and port security systems (eg, in New Orleans) should raise both privacy and national security concerns, even beyond those associated with broader concerns about the surveillance state. At a time when the US Government is focused on concerns about PRC infiltration of US systems and databases (eg TikTok), turning a blind eye to the threat Israel poses is unwise. In fact, I would say it would be appropriate to think of Israel’s leveraging of its tech sector the same way we think of the PRC’s “Military-Civil Fusion” in which the line between government and the private sector is blurred to the point of meaninglessness (Israel’s intervention in lawsuits concerning the supposedly private sector Pegasus spyware provides another datapoint in this space).

    Another concern for the US should be the response of consumers around the world. For years the US has been urging countries to avoid integrating PRC technologies and corporations (eg Huawei) into their national security systems and supply chains. Israel’s operation will have significantly increased distrust of Western hardware and software, particularly in the Global South, making US efforts to pitch alternatives to PRC systems that much harder, again to the detriment of US national security.

    As others have noted, these attacks violate international law, including Israel’s commitments under the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons which prohibits “booby-traps” that could expose civilians to harm. As Lebanon is a party to the ICC, the (bad-faith) arguments the US has been making regarding Palestine’s legitimacy as a party to the Rome Treaty do not apply here, and I hope the Court will investigate these attacks and pursue charges as appropriate. Should they do so, it would be in America’s own interest to distance ourselves from Israel’s manipulation of the tech sector, by endorsing them.

    Eye on Surveillance Article on NOLA: https://lnkd.in/eVM2eTYX

    CSIS on PRC Military-Civil Fusion: https://lnkd.in/eCKgrsYF

    GOI Intervention in Pegasus case: https://lnkd.in/e8cr6Xc9

    The Civil Liberties Act of 1988: Righting a Wrong, Except the Historical Injustice of Slavery

    In 1988, President Ronald Reagan signed the Civil Liberties Act, a landmark piece of legislation that sought to address one of the darkest chapters in American history: the forced internment of Japanese Americans during World War II. This act provided a formal apology and tax-free restitution to those who were unjustly incarcerated, and to their surviving spouses or descendants.

    The internment of Japanese Americans was a grave violation of civil liberties, fueled by fear and prejudice. The Civil Liberties Act of 1988 was a significant step towards acknowledging this injustice and providing some measure of reparation to those who suffered. It serves as a reminder of the importance of upholding civil rights and the dangers of unchecked discrimination.

    The Civil Liberties Act of 1988 holds significant importance in the broader context of civil rights history as it represents a formal acknowledgment and apology for a grave injustice perpetrated by the U.S. government against a specific ethnic group. By providing reparations, it set a precedent for addressing historical wrongs and recognizing the importance of upholding civil liberties for all, regardless of race or ethnicity. This act serves as a reminder of the dangers of prejudice and discrimination, and the ongoing struggle to ensure equality and justice for all.

    In contrast to the justice given to the Japanese American victims of internment, the Supreme Court of Oklahoma has once again denied a petition brought by the last two living survivors of the Tulsa Race Massacre. This decision perpetuates a significant miscarriage of justice, as the City of Tulsa was involved in the white supremacist violence that destroyed the Greenwood community and killed hundreds of its residents. Despite the ongoing discovery of victims’ remains in mass graves, the City of Tulsa maintains that the survivors do not deserve restitution.

    Reparations for Slavery: Addressing a Historical Injustice

    The issue of reparations for slavery has been a topic of ongoing debate in the United States. It centers on the idea of providing compensation to the descendants of enslaved Africans for the immense harm and injustices inflicted upon them and their ancestors.

    Proponents argue that reparations are necessary to acknowledge the legacy of slavery and its enduring impact on African Americans, including economic disparities, systemic racism, and intergenerational trauma. They propose various forms of reparations, such as direct payments, educational opportunities, healthcare access, and community development initiatives.

    Opponents, however, raise concerns about the practicality and fairness of reparations, questioning who should receive them, how they should be funded, and whether they would truly address the root causes of racial inequality.

    Comparing and Contrasting Reparations for Japanese Internment and Slavery

    Similarities:

    • Both represent attempts to address historical injustices perpetrated by the U.S. government against specific groups.
    • Both involve acknowledging the harm inflicted and providing some form of compensation or restitution.
    • Both face challenges in terms of determining eligibility, forms of reparation, and addressing the long-term effects of the injustice.

    Differences:

    • Nature of Injustice: Japanese internment was a temporary, albeit traumatic, violation of civil liberties during wartime, while slavery was a centuries-long system of brutal oppression and dehumanization.
    • Scale of Impact: Slavery affected millions of Africans and their descendants over generations, while Japanese internment affected a smaller, though still significant, number of people.
    • Form of Reparations: Japanese internment reparations primarily involved monetary compensation and a formal apology, while reparations for slavery encompass a broader range of proposals, including direct payments, educational opportunities, healthcare access, and community development.
    • Current Status: Reparations for Japanese internment were implemented through the Civil Liberties Act of 1988, while reparations for slavery remain a topic of ongoing debate and have not yet been realized at a national level.

    Conclusion:

    While both Japanese internment and slavery represent grave injustices in American history, the scale, nature, and lasting impact of each differ significantly. This has led to different approaches and outcomes in the pursuit of reparations. The Civil Liberties Act of 1988 serves as a precedent for acknowledging and addressing historical wrongs, but the debate over reparations for slavery highlights the complexities and challenges of redressing the deep-seated legacy of this institution.

    While the debate continues, the call for reparations for slavery highlights the deep-seated wounds of the past and the ongoing struggle for racial justice in America. It serves as a reminder of the need for honest dialogue and meaningful action to address the historical and contemporary effects of slavery.

    Federal Investigation Demanded After Tulsa Race Massacre Survivors Denied Justice

    The Oklahoma Supreme Court dealt another devastating blow to the last two living survivors of the Tulsa Race Massacre, Lessie Benningfield Randle and Viola Fletcher, by denying their petition for justice.

    On September 11, the AP reported, “The Oklahoma Supreme Court has rejected a request to reconsider its ruling to dismiss a lawsuit filed by the last two known living survivors of the 1921 Tulsa Race Massacre. Without comment, seven members of the court on Tuesday turned away the request by 110-year-old Viola Fletcher and 109-year-old Lessie Benningfield Randle to rehear its June ruling that upheld a decision by a district court judge in Tulsa to dismiss the case. Justice James Edmondson would have reheard the case and Justice Richard Darby did not vote.” 

    The decision has effectively perpetuated one of the most egregious miscarriages of justice in American history.

    The City of Tulsa, complicit in the white supremacist violence that destroyed the thriving Black community of Greenwood in 1921, keeps evaded accountability. And the courts decision comes even as the remains of Massacre victims continue to be unearthed from mass graves, a chilling reminder of the atrocities committed.

    Still, despite the setback, the fight for justice is far from over according to the attorneys for the survivors, including lead counsel Damario Solomon-Simmons, who have vowed to continue the pursuit of justice through every available avenue. The survivors themselves, despite their advanced age, remain determined to see the perpetrators held accountable.

    The denial of justice in Oklahoma has sparked renewed calls for a federal investigation into the Tulsa Race Massacre. Advocates are urging President Biden and Vice President Harris, who have personally met with the survivors, to invoke the Emmett Till Unsolved Civil Rights Crimes Act to address this historical injustice. Thus far, the only action towards justice the Biden-Harris Administration has taken is in the form of a proclamation on May 31, 2021. “Today, on this solemn centennial of the Tulsa Race Massacre, I call on the American people to reflect on the deep roots of racial terror in our Nation and recommit to the work of rooting out systemic racism across our country,” Biden states. In other words, and to this day, the government will only offer its “thoughts and prayers” for the grave injustice committed against the victims of the Tulsa Race Massacre, including for the over 400 years of slavery in America. 

    Nonetheless, the fight for justice for the Tulsa Race Massacre survivors is not just about the past; it’s about confronting the ongoing legacy of racism and systemic injustice. It’s about ensuring that the stories of Greenwood, its people, and its destruction are never forgotten. As we stand at this critical juncture in our nations history, it is imperative that we support the survivors and demand accountability for the crimes committed against them and their community similar to the 1988 Civil Liberties Act when President Ronald Reagan signed the landmark piece of legislation that sought to address one of the darkest chapters in American history: the forced internment of Japanese Americans during World War II. This act provided a formal apology and tax-free restitution to those who were unjustly incarcerated, and to their surviving spouses or descendants. 

    About The Tulsa Race Massacre

    The Tulsa Race Massacre took place in 1921 when a mob of white individuals, deputized and armed by municipal and county officials, killed, looted, and burned down the Greenwood area. The Massacre resulted in the murder of more than 300 Tulsans and the destruction of the prosperous Greenwood neighborhood, often referred to as “Black Wall Street.”

    About Greenwood

    Greenwood, most revered for “Black Wall Street” was co-founded by Black Creeks—it became one of the most prosperous, organized, and successful Black communities in United States history, and a place for Black people to escape the political, economic, and social oppression of southern lawmakers post-civil war.

    New Online US Passport Renewal Process

    As part of Passport Month, the US State Department has announced a new online passport renewal process, streamlining the process for eligible applicants. This new system eliminates the need for paper applications, mailed checks, and in-person appointments, offering a more convenient and efficient way to renew passports.

    “U.S. passport renewal just got easier! We’ve fully launched our Online Passport Renewal (OPR) system. You can skip the printing and mailing. Renew from the comfort of your home (couch!) completely online, 24/7. It’s secure, convenient, and ready for you to use. See if you qualify to renew with OPR at travel.state.gov/renewonline.” 

    Eligibility

    To utilize this new online system, applicants must meet specific criteria:

    • Be a US citizen and resident aged 25 or older.
    • Possess a previous passport that was valid for 10 years and is not lost or stolen (expired passports are acceptable).
    • Not be changing their name, gender, date of birth, or place of birth on the new passport.
    • Reside in a US state or territory.
    • Be applying for a regular tourist passport.

    Process

    The online renewal process involves creating an account on the State Department’s website, entering previous passport information, and uploading a recent digital photo that adheres to specific guidelines. Payment for the renewal fee can be made online using a debit or credit card.

    Benefits

    This new online system offers numerous benefits, including:

    • Greater convenience and efficiency for eligible applicants.
    • Reduced processing time compared to traditional renewal methods.
    • Elimination of the need for paper applications, mailing, and in-person appointments.
    • Ability to upload a digital photo from a smartphone, eliminating the need for professional photo services.

    Impact

    The State Department anticipates that this new online renewal system will significantly impact passport processing, with an estimated 5 million Americans expected to utilize it annually. The system is a major step towards modernizing and streamlining the passport renewal process, making it easier and more accessible for US citizens.

    Teamsters Union Breaks with Tradition, Withholds Presidential Endorsement

    In a surprising move, the International Brotherhood of Teamsters has decided not to endorse a candidate in the 2024 presidential race. This marks a significant departure from their usual practice and the first time since 1996 that they have not backed a presidential candidate.

    The union’s General President, Sean O’Brien, expressed disappointment that neither major candidate, Trump nor Harris, had made satisfactory commitments to safeguard the interests of working people and unions. Key concerns for the Teamsters included protecting union campaigns, respecting workers’ right to strike, and prioritizing labor interests over those of big businesses.

    This decision comes after a long period of deliberation, with the Teamsters notably delaying their endorsement compared to other major unions like the United Auto Workers and the AFL-CIO, which had already endorsed Biden and Harris.

    Historically, the Teamsters have endorsed candidates from both major parties, and O’Brien’s outreach to Republicans had fueled speculation that they might break with their recent trend of supporting Democratic nominees. However, internal polling revealed strong support for Trump among Teamsters members, further complicating the endorsement process.

    Ultimately, the Teamsters’ decision to withhold an endorsement highlights the challenges both parties face in securing the support of labor unions and underscores the complex political landscape of the 2024 election. While the union has not officially backed any candidate, they are strongly encouraging their members to vote and remain engaged in the political process.