Posts tagged with "tulsa race massacre"

The Civil Liberties Act of 1988: Righting a Wrong, Except the Historical Injustice of Slavery

Leave a reply

In 1988, President Ronald Reagan signed the Civil Liberties Act, a landmark piece of legislation that sought to address one of the darkest chapters in American history: the forced internment of Japanese Americans during World War II. This act provided a formal apology and tax-free restitution to those who were unjustly incarcerated, and to their surviving spouses or descendants.

The internment of Japanese Americans was a grave violation of civil liberties, fueled by fear and prejudice. The Civil Liberties Act of 1988 was a significant step towards acknowledging this injustice and providing some measure of reparation to those who suffered. It serves as a reminder of the importance of upholding civil rights and the dangers of unchecked discrimination.

The Civil Liberties Act of 1988 holds significant importance in the broader context of civil rights history as it represents a formal acknowledgment and apology for a grave injustice perpetrated by the U.S. government against a specific ethnic group. By providing reparations, it set a precedent for addressing historical wrongs and recognizing the importance of upholding civil liberties for all, regardless of race or ethnicity. This act serves as a reminder of the dangers of prejudice and discrimination, and the ongoing struggle to ensure equality and justice for all.

In contrast to the justice given to the Japanese American victims of internment, the Supreme Court of Oklahoma has once again denied a petition brought by the last two living survivors of the Tulsa Race Massacre. This decision perpetuates a significant miscarriage of justice, as the City of Tulsa was involved in the white supremacist violence that destroyed the Greenwood community and killed hundreds of its residents. Despite the ongoing discovery of victims’ remains in mass graves, the City of Tulsa maintains that the survivors do not deserve restitution.

Reparations for Slavery: Addressing a Historical Injustice

The issue of reparations for slavery has been a topic of ongoing debate in the United States. It centers on the idea of providing compensation to the descendants of enslaved Africans for the immense harm and injustices inflicted upon them and their ancestors.

Proponents argue that reparations are necessary to acknowledge the legacy of slavery and its enduring impact on African Americans, including economic disparities, systemic racism, and intergenerational trauma. They propose various forms of reparations, such as direct payments, educational opportunities, healthcare access, and community development initiatives.

Opponents, however, raise concerns about the practicality and fairness of reparations, questioning who should receive them, how they should be funded, and whether they would truly address the root causes of racial inequality.

Comparing and Contrasting Reparations for Japanese Internment and Slavery

Similarities:

  • Both represent attempts to address historical injustices perpetrated by the U.S. government against specific groups.
  • Both involve acknowledging the harm inflicted and providing some form of compensation or restitution.
  • Both face challenges in terms of determining eligibility, forms of reparation, and addressing the long-term effects of the injustice.

Differences:

  • Nature of Injustice: Japanese internment was a temporary, albeit traumatic, violation of civil liberties during wartime, while slavery was a centuries-long system of brutal oppression and dehumanization.
  • Scale of Impact: Slavery affected millions of Africans and their descendants over generations, while Japanese internment affected a smaller, though still significant, number of people.
  • Form of Reparations: Japanese internment reparations primarily involved monetary compensation and a formal apology, while reparations for slavery encompass a broader range of proposals, including direct payments, educational opportunities, healthcare access, and community development.
  • Current Status: Reparations for Japanese internment were implemented through the Civil Liberties Act of 1988, while reparations for slavery remain a topic of ongoing debate and have not yet been realized at a national level.

Conclusion:

While both Japanese internment and slavery represent grave injustices in American history, the scale, nature, and lasting impact of each differ significantly. This has led to different approaches and outcomes in the pursuit of reparations. The Civil Liberties Act of 1988 serves as a precedent for acknowledging and addressing historical wrongs, but the debate over reparations for slavery highlights the complexities and challenges of redressing the deep-seated legacy of this institution.

While the debate continues, the call for reparations for slavery highlights the deep-seated wounds of the past and the ongoing struggle for racial justice in America. It serves as a reminder of the need for honest dialogue and meaningful action to address the historical and contemporary effects of slavery.

Federal Investigation Demanded After Tulsa Race Massacre Survivors Denied Justice

Leave a reply

The Oklahoma Supreme Court dealt another devastating blow to the last two living survivors of the Tulsa Race Massacre, Lessie Benningfield Randle and Viola Fletcher, by denying their petition for justice.

On September 11, the AP reported, “The Oklahoma Supreme Court has rejected a request to reconsider its ruling to dismiss a lawsuit filed by the last two known living survivors of the 1921 Tulsa Race Massacre. Without comment, seven members of the court on Tuesday turned away the request by 110-year-old Viola Fletcher and 109-year-old Lessie Benningfield Randle to rehear its June ruling that upheld a decision by a district court judge in Tulsa to dismiss the case. Justice James Edmondson would have reheard the case and Justice Richard Darby did not vote.” 

The decision has effectively perpetuated one of the most egregious miscarriages of justice in American history.

The City of Tulsa, complicit in the white supremacist violence that destroyed the thriving Black community of Greenwood in 1921, keeps evaded accountability. And the courts decision comes even as the remains of Massacre victims continue to be unearthed from mass graves, a chilling reminder of the atrocities committed.

Still, despite the setback, the fight for justice is far from over according to the attorneys for the survivors, including lead counsel Damario Solomon-Simmons, who have vowed to continue the pursuit of justice through every available avenue. The survivors themselves, despite their advanced age, remain determined to see the perpetrators held accountable.

The denial of justice in Oklahoma has sparked renewed calls for a federal investigation into the Tulsa Race Massacre. Advocates are urging President Biden and Vice President Harris, who have personally met with the survivors, to invoke the Emmett Till Unsolved Civil Rights Crimes Act to address this historical injustice. Thus far, the only action towards justice the Biden-Harris Administration has taken is in the form of a proclamation on May 31, 2021. “Today, on this solemn centennial of the Tulsa Race Massacre, I call on the American people to reflect on the deep roots of racial terror in our Nation and recommit to the work of rooting out systemic racism across our country,” Biden states. In other words, and to this day, the government will only offer its “thoughts and prayers” for the grave injustice committed against the victims of the Tulsa Race Massacre, including for the over 400 years of slavery in America. 

Nonetheless, the fight for justice for the Tulsa Race Massacre survivors is not just about the past; it’s about confronting the ongoing legacy of racism and systemic injustice. It’s about ensuring that the stories of Greenwood, its people, and its destruction are never forgotten. As we stand at this critical juncture in our nations history, it is imperative that we support the survivors and demand accountability for the crimes committed against them and their community similar to the 1988 Civil Liberties Act when President Ronald Reagan signed the landmark piece of legislation that sought to address one of the darkest chapters in American history: the forced internment of Japanese Americans during World War II. This act provided a formal apology and tax-free restitution to those who were unjustly incarcerated, and to their surviving spouses or descendants. 

About The Tulsa Race Massacre

The Tulsa Race Massacre took place in 1921 when a mob of white individuals, deputized and armed by municipal and county officials, killed, looted, and burned down the Greenwood area. The Massacre resulted in the murder of more than 300 Tulsans and the destruction of the prosperous Greenwood neighborhood, often referred to as “Black Wall Street.”

About Greenwood

Greenwood, most revered for “Black Wall Street” was co-founded by Black Creeks—it became one of the most prosperous, organized, and successful Black communities in United States history, and a place for Black people to escape the political, economic, and social oppression of southern lawmakers post-civil war.