The Apache Stronghold, a Native American coalition from Arizona, is seeking Supreme Court intervention to protect Oak Flat, a sacred site threatened by a proposed copper mine. The group argues that the transfer of this land to a foreign mining company violates their religious freedoms.
Oak Flat: A Sacred Site
Oak Flat holds deep religious significance for the Apache people, who have conducted ceremonies there for generations. The land’s potential destruction by Resolution Copper, a mining company, has sparked a legal battle that could have far-reaching implications for religious freedom in the United States.
The Legal Battle
The Apache Stronghold’s case, Apache Stronghold v. United States, hinges on the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA). The group argues that the government’s actions in facilitating the land transfer and permitting the mining operation infringe upon their religious rights.
The Apache Stronghold’s Appeal
Following a denial by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, the Apache Stronghold has turned to the Supreme Court as a last resort. They hope to convince the justices to hear their case and set a precedent for the protection of sacred sites under RFRA.
The Implications
The Supreme Court’s decision on whether to hear the case could significantly impact how RFRA is applied in cases where religious rights clash with economic and governmental interests. A ruling in favor of the Apache Stronghold could strengthen protections for religious groups seeking to safeguard their sacred lands.
The Outcome
The Supreme Court receives thousands of petitions annually and typically hears around 60 cases each term. While the outcome remains uncertain, the Apache Stronghold’s case highlights the ongoing struggle for religious freedom and the protection of sacred lands in the United States.
