Posts tagged with "education"

Nebraska’s Wake-Up Call: The Big Beautiful Bill’s Real Cost

Leave a reply

In Nebraska, a state often characterized by its resilient spirit and a population known for “looking out for one another,” a profound disillusionment is settling in. The “Big Beautiful Bill,” once lauded by many, is now revealing its true face, and the consequences are far from beautiful. This deceptive piece of legislation is unleashing far-reaching, detrimental impacts on core American values, particularly in states like Nebraska, affecting everything from immigration and labor to healthcare and education. As the chickens come home to roost, the hard truth emerges: for decades, certain segments of America have been told the target was “them”—Black folks, Brown immigrants, the poor—when, in fact, they were pawns on the same board. From the Confederacy’s slaughter of its own poor white soldiers to modern political schemes that gut rural economies, the powerful have always known that fear and racial division are the cheapest currency to buy obedience.

The Economic Fallout: When the Workforce Vanishes

The reliance of Nebraska’s agricultural and meatpacking industries on migrant labor has been a quiet cornerstone of its prosperity for decades. Migrant workers, primarily Hispanic and Central American, formed the backbone of large-scale farming and food processing operations, planting and harvesting crops and working long hours in meatpacking plants. Their labor kept costs low and enabled Nebraska to compete in national and international markets, even contributing to one in four steaks consumed in the country.

However, once anti-immigrant policies, aggressive enforcement measures, and a hostile social climate escalated, many migrants decided Nebraska was no longer safe or viable for their families. They sought sanctuary elsewhere, returned to their home countries, or moved to urban areas. The immediate impact was a crippling labor shortage during critical planting and harvesting seasons. Crops rotted or were never planted, leading to reduced yields and empty silos. Farmers were forced to leave land fallow, unable to afford the rapid mechanization needed to replace the absent labor. Processing plants cut hours or closed shifts, sending ripple effects into local businesses and shrinking tax revenue. The blow was exacerbated by China’s $2 billion soybean order freeze, reducing demand for even the crops that were planted.

The result was not merely an agricultural crisis, but a systemic economic collapse in rural counties. Schools lost funding as the tax base shrank, local shops saw fewer customers, and farm families already operating on thin margins fell deeper into debt. In essence, Nebraska’s migrant labor exodus serves as a stark case study in how political ideology collides disastrously with economic reality. The state pushed away the very workforce that sustained its prosperity, proving that in agriculture, as in life, you cannot harvest what you have driven away. This isn’t “getting what they deserve.” This is getting exactly what they voted for.

Gutting the Safety Net: Healthcare and Hunger

The “Big Beautiful Bill” also directly attacks Nebraska’s healthcare system and food assistance programs, unraveling the fabric of communal care the state prides itself on. Over the next decade, this bill will slash approximately $6.5 billion in federal Medicaid funding to Nebraska. The human cost of this cut is staggering: more than 78,000 Nebraskans, including thousands of children, will lose their health coverage. These harmful cuts are not isolated; they are part of a calculated trade-off, sacrificing healthcare for the vulnerable to fund tax breaks for the rich.

This isn’t just about numbers on a spreadsheet; it’s about families unable to take a sick child to the doctor, seniors struggling to afford nursing home care, new mothers without nearby maternity services, and entire communities left without any medical care at all. The ripple effects extend beyond the clinic door, projecting 5,000 job losses and an annual reduction of $28 million in state tax revenue, further shrinking the state’s economy.

Adding to the devastation, the bill cuts $322 million from food assistance (SNAP), placing 155,000 Nebraskans—including 64,000 children—at greater risk of hunger. Over 70 percent of counties in Nebraska, particularly rural communities, will struggle with food access.

The immediate consequences are dire for healthcare infrastructure. Just hours after the bill passed, Curtis Medical Center announced its closure due to funding cuts. Two more hospitals, Avera Creighton Hospital and Ogallala Community Hospital, are at high risk of closing, with three others close behind. This is not surprising, given that in the last two years, one in five Nebraska hospitals had already eliminated crucial services like labor and delivery units, hospital-owned nursing homes, and behavioral health services. These cuts put an already strained health system at severe risk.

For a state where nearly 7 in 10 hospitals are rural, and many Nebraskans already live far from care, these closures are a death knell. Imagine calling 911 for a stroke and being told the nearest ambulance is 45 minutes away. This hypothetical scenario could become a grim reality if hospitals continue to shut their doors. This bill threatens not just the facilities, but the people and values that keep Nebraska communities strong. It turns our backs on the tradition of “looking out for one another,” stripping away healthcare from those who need it most and handing out more to those who already have enough. “Where you live shouldn’t determine whether you live” is a promise being broken.

III. The Broader Cultural Implications: Undermining Constitutional Ideals

Beyond its economic impact, the “Big Beautiful Bill” carries a chilling array of provisions that directly assault civil and human rights, fundamentally altering the fabric of American society and undermining its constitutional ideals. As detailed in reports like the LULAC analysis, the bill introduces:

  • Increased fees and barriers to legal immigration: Imposing non-waivable fees for asylum applications (including an annual fee while pending), work permits, humanitarian parole, and even a $5,000 apprehension fee for unauthorized border crossers. This effectively prices out the most vulnerable seeking refuge.
  • Expanded immigration enforcement and indefinite family detention: Billions are allocated to hire 10,000 new ICE agents and expand detention facilities, including overriding Flores Settlement protections to allow for the indefinite detention of migrant families and children. This is a direct assault on due process and human dignity.
  • Codification of “Remain in Mexico” and expanded expedited removal: This policy forces asylum-seekers back across the border to await hearings in often dangerous conditions, while expedited removal allows for fast-track deportations without a court hearing, even for long-term residents with minor criminal inadmissibility.
  • Co-opting state and local law enforcement: The bill funds programs that entice local police and sheriffs to enforce federal immigration laws, expanding the reach of deportation efforts into local communities and chilling interaction between immigrants and law enforcement.
  • Restrictions on unaccompanied minor procedures: It makes it easier to repatriate unaccompanied children, even those with credible fears of persecution, by overriding existing protections and imposing stringent background checks on potential sponsors, deterring family reunification.
  • New fines and penalties: This includes a $3,500 “Sponsor Fee” and a $5,000 bond for those sponsoring unaccompanied minors (forfeited if the child misses a court date), a $5,000 fine for immigrants who miss court hearings, and perhaps most egregiously, a 5% excise tax on international remittance transfers, disproportionately targeting immigrant workers supporting their families abroad.

These measures are not merely “policy”; they are a direct assault on due process, the pursuit of liberty, and the fundamental right to seek refuge. They exploit fear and division, reminiscent of historical tactics that have always harmed the common American. The bill punishes and marginalizes, stripping basic needs, scaling up enforcement, and erecting new financial and procedural hurdles at nearly every turn. It is, in essence, a mechanism to make it financially ruinous for migrants to even attempt to live or legalize in the United States, fundamentally altering the fabric of American society.

Call to Action: Upholding the Constitution

The core American ideals of liberty, justice, and due process for all are not abstract concepts; they are the very foundation upon which our nation stands. The “Big Beautiful Bill” systematically erodes these foundations, punishing the vulnerable, decimating essential services, and undermining the economic stability of communities like those in Nebraska.

It is imperative that every American understands the real, devastating consequences of such legislation. This is not just a political issue; it is a moral imperative. We must stand against policies that exploit fear and division for political gain, and instead, uphold the Constitution’s promise of justice for all.

Here are actionable steps you can take:

  • Contact Your Representatives: Follow the lead of individuals like Dr. Nikki Romanik, who are reaching out to remind elected officials that “the good life” includes care for all. Make your voice heard.
  • Support Organizations: Support organizations actively fighting for civil and human rights, workers’ rights, and fair immigration policies. They are on the front lines, providing critical legal aid, advocacy, and support to affected communities.
  • Engage in Local Advocacy: Join local groups and initiatives working to protect vulnerable populations and advocate for policies that uphold constitutional rights.
  • Vote to Protect Civil and Human Rights: Educate yourself on candidates’ stances on these critical issues and vote for those who commit to protecting civil and human rights for all.

A powerful reminder that upholding the Constitution and its promise of justice for all is the responsibility of every citizen.

Columbia’s Choice and the Unfinished Business of American Justice

Leave a reply

In the ongoing, complex tapestry of American culture, the concept of “reparations” has ignited fervent debate, revealing the deeply entrenched legacies of historical injustice. For generations, calls for reparations for the brutal institution of American slavery and its enduring aftermath – from Jim Crow to pervasive racial inequality – have been met with resistance, legal hurdles, and a prevailing national reticence. Yet, a recent development at one of America’s most prestigious academic institutions, Columbia University, has thrown the conversation back to center, offering a compelling, if unsettling, case study in selective justice. This isn’t merely an isolated incident; it’s a profound moment that compels us to examine who receives reparations and what these decisions truly signify for the pursuit of justice rooted in America’s foundational ideals.

Need to Know: Columbia’s Compromised Past and Present Priorities

Columbia University, an institution often lauded for its progressive academic environment, has a deeply troubling historical ledger that remains largely unaddressed. In its early years, known as King’s College, the university was profoundly intertwined with the slave trade. Research has revealed that at least half of its first ten presidents owned slaves. By the 1760s, slavery was so normalized that it had seeped into the curriculum, largely due to students hailing from wealthy merchant families whose fortunes were built on the backs of enslaved people. Even the operational funds for maintaining college buildings were predominantly donated by active participants in the slave trade, and historical records even show a stepson of George Washington bringing a slave with him to the university. Despite this documented history of direct and indirect benefit from slavery, Columbia has never paid reparations to Black Americans.

This stark historical reality contrasts sharply with the university’s recent actions. Bowing to pressure from the Trump Administration and facing a federal investigation, Columbia agreed to a $200 million settlement for alleged antisemitism and established a $21 million class claims fund to provide reparations to Jewish employees impacted by these claims. This decision followed a period of intense anti-war student protests on campus in April 2024, advocating for divestment from Israel, which were met with violent crackdowns by law enforcement. While anti-Zionist Jewish groups were prominent in these protests, and many anti-war advocates faced assault, the narrative quickly shifted to one of widespread antisemitism on college campuses, amplified by media outlets. The university’s response culminated in compensation for “hurting people’s feelings,” while the descendants of those upon whose forced labor the institution was built receive nothing.

Takeaways: The Selective Application of Justice

The decision by Columbia University to issue reparations for alleged antisemitism while sidestepping its profound historical ties to American slavery is not merely a financial transaction; it’s a profound statement on the selective application of justice in America. This case highlights a critical distinction: the willingness to compensate for perceived emotional or contemporary harms versus the enduring, generational, and systemic damage wrought by centuries of chattel slavery and subsequent discriminatory policies.

Reparations, as understood under international human rights law, are not ordinary public policy or a substitute for welfare programs. They are an act of justice, intended to acknowledge and repair the causes and consequences of human rights violations. The legacy of slavery in the United States extends far beyond historical texts; it actively shapes contemporary society, manifesting in staggering racial wealth gaps, land dispossession, unequal access to homeownership, healthcare disparities, educational inequities, and a disproportionately punitive criminal legal system. For instance, the median wealth for Black families remains a mere fraction of that for white families, a direct consequence of denied economic fruits of labor and systemic exclusion from market participation for centuries. Federal policies like redlining and urban renewal, implemented long after slavery’s formal end, actively cemented racial segregation and deprived Black communities of wealth-building opportunities.

Columbia’s choice to compensate for what it deems “antisemitism” – a term often weaponized to stifle dissent, as evidenced by the “Project Esther” strategy – while ignoring the foundational injustice of slavery underscores a profound moral and ethical inconsistency. It effectively prioritizes a narrow, politicized definition of harm over the deeply embedded, multigenerational trauma and economic disenfranchisement that continues to impact Black Americans.

The Cost of Inaction: The Economic Burden of Unaddressed Racism

Beyond the moral imperative, the failure to rectify the historical injustices of slavery and systemic racism carries a staggering economic price tag for the entire nation. Racism is not only morally wrong but also severely detrimental to the U.S. economy. A recent study by Citigroup, titled “Closing the Racial Inequality Gaps,” revealed that in the last 20 years, racism has cost the U.S. economy an astounding $16 trillion. This figure is not insignificant, especially when considering the U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) is approximately $30.33 trillion. As Abibat Rahman-Davies, former Legislative Representative, Economic Justice, stated in her report, “It may seem that racism in our economy only affects people of color, but it costs all of us.” 

These detrimental effects are particularly stark across key sectors:

  • Housing: Housing is a primary source of intergenerational wealth, yet public, private, and federal discrimination, including policies like redlining, have historically prevented families of color from owning homes and devalued their properties. This has meant decades of missed opportunities for wealth accumulation as home values appreciated. For instance, in 2016, the Federal Reserve found the median housing wealth for Black families was $124,000, compared to $200,000 for white families. Economists estimate that $218 billion was lost in the last two decades due to discrimination in providing credit for home purchases to families of color. This economic racism isn’t just historical; it persists today, as evidenced by instances where homes owned by Black families are devalued. The Austin family’s experience, where their renovated home appraised significantly lower until staged to appear white-owned, highlights this ongoing issue.
  • Education: Due to housing discrimination and the reliance on property taxes for school funding, schools in predominantly Black communities are often under-resourced compared to those in wealthier, whiter areas. This disparity deeply affects the quality of education available to children of color, making the path toward higher education and increased income potential exceptionally difficult. The Citigroup study estimates that $90 billion to $113 billion in lifetime income is lost from discrimination in accessing higher education.
  • Tax System: The current tax system disproportionately benefits those with wealth, which is heavily concentrated in white families (the net worth of a median white household is ten times that of a median Black household). A lower tax rate on income from wealth versus wages perpetuates this racial wealth divide, and benefits like mortgage interest deductions further advantage homeowners over renters, disproportionately impacting low-income Black, Latino, and Native American households.

The adverse effects of racism are compounding, impacting not only people of color but hurting the nation’s overall economic potential. Economists at Citigroup project that by closing these racial inequality gaps, approximately $5 trillion could be added to the U.S. GDP through 2025. This makes a clear economic case for actively working to dismantle systemic racism and pursuing reparative justice.

Implications for American Culture and Society: An Unfinished Reckoning

Columbia University’s decision is a microcosm of a larger, unsettling trend in American culture: a reluctance to fully confront and repair the enduring harms of slavery and its aftermath. While Congress has passed resolutions apologizing for slavery, these have never been signed into law, leaving a federal void in acknowledgment and repair. This incident at Columbia illuminates the “fierce urgency of now” for reparative justice, not just as a historical formality, but as a crucial step towards dismantling present-day structural racism.

The broader conversation about reparations in America, as advocated by organizations like Human Rights Watch and the International Center for Transitional Justice (ICTJ), emphasizes that effective remedies for human rights violations must include restitution, compensation, rehabilitation, satisfaction (truth-telling, apologies, memorials), and guarantees of non-repetition. These measures are not about “handouts” but about addressing specific, documented harms that continue to impact Black communities in every facet of life – from health outcomes to educational opportunities and interactions with the criminal justice system. 

Columbia’s choice, however, reveals a national discomfort with true accountability for historical wrongs. It suggests a preference for addressing issues that are more politically palatable or less financially demanding, rather than confronting the deep-seated systemic racism that continues to undermine the very ideals of justice and equality America purports to uphold. The ongoing struggle for S. 40, a bill that would establish a commission to study and develop reparation proposals for African Americans, highlights this national reluctance.

Ultimately, Columbia University’s decision serves as a powerful, if painful, reminder that the American reckoning with its past is far from complete. Until institutions and the nation as a whole are willing to acknowledge and meaningfully address the deepest wounds of history, the promise of justice for all Americans will remain tragically unfulfilled.

The Unraveling of a Public Trust: The CPB’s Closure and the Future of American Identity

Leave a reply

The Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB), a cornerstone of American public media for nearly 60 years, is ceasing operations. This momentous decision, effective September 30, 2025, comes after the elimination of its federal funding by the Trump Administration and Congress. The CPB has been the steward of federal investment in public broadcasting, supporting over 1,500 local public television and radio stations, including giants like PBS and NPR. From educational programming like PBS Kids to locally relevant journalism, emergency communications, and cultural content, CPB has woven itself into the fabric of American communities, providing essential services to every corner of the country.

Take-Aways:

  • A Historic Shift: For the first time in over five decades, the CPB will operate without federal funding, leading to its imminent closure.
  • Broad Impact: The loss of CPB funding directly impacts local public radio and television stations nationwide, many of which rely significantly on federal support. Rural areas, in particular, stand to lose vital educational resources and emergency alert systems.
  • Beyond Entertainment: Public media is not merely a source of entertainment; it’s a critical component of emergency response plans in nearly half of the states, providing crucial information during natural disasters like storms, floods, and wildfires.
  • The Erosion of Public Trust: The CPB’s closure signifies a profound change in the public media landscape, challenging a trusted institution that has fostered civil discourse and cultural connection.

Implications for American Culture:

The demise of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting is more than just a financial setback; it’s a tremor that will reverberate through the very soul of American identity. For generations, public broadcasting has been a democratic promise: access to free, unbiased information, enriching educational content for all, and a platform for diverse cultural storytelling.

Consider the bedrock principle of free education, a value deeply rooted in the American spirit. PBS Kids, a direct beneficiary of CPB funding, has been a silent teacher in millions of homes, bridging educational gaps and inspiring young minds regardless of socioeconomic status. Its absence leaves a void that commercial alternatives, often driven by profit motives, cannot adequately fill. What does it say about our commitment to educating our youth when the very mechanisms that ensure equitable access to learning are dismantled?

Furthermore, the role of local public media in fostering community and civic engagement cannot be overstated. In an increasingly polarized nation, public radio and television stations have served as vital conduits for locally relevant journalism and civil discourse. They are often the first responders in times of crisis, delivering critical emergency alerts when other communication channels fail. The loss of these local voices and essential services will inevitably weaken community cohesion, leaving gaps in information and increasing vulnerability, especially in rural areas where alternative media sources are scarce.

This moment calls for reflection on what we value as a nation. Is it a future where information is dictated by commercial interests or filtered through increasingly narrow partisan lenses? Or is it one where a well-informed citizenry, empowered by accessible and diverse public resources, continues to shape a vibrant and inclusive American narrative?

The closure of the CPB is a cautionary tale, urging us to recognize how fundamental institutions, once taken for granted, can be eroded. It is a call to action for all who believe in the power of free education, open discourse, and the essential role of trusted public institutions in strengthening our democracy and preserving the unique tapestry of American culture. We must now collectively consider how to champion and sustain the principles that the CPB embodied, ensuring that the light of knowledge and the ties of community continue to bind us as Americans.

Ruby Bridges: A Pivotal Moment in American Education and Civil Rights

Leave a reply

The image of a young Ruby Bridges, escorted by federal marshals into a previously all-white school, is a stark reminder of the struggle for racial integration in America. Her brave act of defiance in the face of hatred and hostility paved the way for countless other African American students to access equal educational opportunities.

Historical Significance

Ruby Bridges’ first day at William Frantz Elementary School in New Orleans on November 14, 1960, was a watershed moment in American history. It marked a significant step forward in the fight for desegregation, following the landmark Supreme Court ruling in Brown v. Board of Education, which declared school segregation unconstitutional.

Ruby’s story highlights the deep-seated racism and resistance to change that existed in many parts of the country. The angry mob that gathered to protest her attendance, spewing racial slurs and threats, underscored the challenges and dangers faced by those who sought to dismantle segregation.

Despite the immense pressure and intimidation, Ruby’s courage and resilience served as an inspiration to the Civil Rights Movement. Her actions helped to galvanize support for desegregation and pushed the nation closer to achieving racial equality.

Takeaways and Lessons Learned

Ruby Bridges’ story teaches us the importance of standing up for what is right, even in the face of adversity. It reminds us that change often comes at a cost, but the fight for justice and equality is always worth it.

We can also learn from the mistakes of the past. The resistance to desegregation in New Orleans and other parts of the country reveals the dangers of prejudice and discrimination. It is a reminder that we must continue to work towards a society that is inclusive and welcoming to all.

Looking Ahead

While Ruby Bridges’ story represents a significant victory in the fight for civil rights, it is important to remember that the struggle for equality is ongoing. We must continue to address the systemic inequalities that persist in our education system and society as a whole.

Ruby Bridges’ legacy serves as a powerful reminder of the importance of education as a tool for social change. By providing all children with access to quality education, we can create a more just and equitable society for future generations.

Call to Action:

By remembering Ruby Bridges’ story and continuing to fight for equality, we can honor her legacy and create a better future for all.

Women Continue to Shape Universal Human Rights

Leave a reply

International Day of Women in Diplomacy is celebrated annually on June 24th to recognize the important contributions and achievements of women in the field of diplomacy. The day aims to promote gender equality in diplomacy and to encourage the participation of women in peace and security negotiations.

History

The International Day of Women in Diplomacy was established by the United Nations General Assembly in 2018. The resolution was co-sponsored by over 50 countries and was adopted by consensus.

Importance

The International Day of Women in Diplomacy is an important opportunity to celebrate the achievements of women in diplomacy and to raise awareness of the challenges they face. The day also serves to promote gender equality in diplomacy and to encourage the participation of women in peace and security negotiations.

Challenges Facing Women in Diplomacy

Women in diplomacy continue to face a number of challenges, including:

  • Gender discrimination: Women are often underrepresented in diplomatic positions and are less likely to be promoted to senior positions.
  • Sexual harassment and violence: Women in diplomacy are often subjected to sexual harassment and violence, which can create a hostile work environment and make it difficult for women to succeed.
  • Lack of access to training and opportunities: Women in diplomacy often have less access to training and opportunities than men, which can limit their career development.

Progress

Despite the challenges, there has been some progress in terms of gender equality in diplomacy. In recent years, more women have been appointed to senior diplomatic positions and there have been a number of initiatives to promote the participation of women in peace and security negotiations.

Did you know?

  • There are 31 countries where 34 women serve as Heads of State and/or Government as of January 2023.
  • Of the five United Nations-led or co-led peace processes in 2021, two were led by women mediators, and all five consulted with civil society and were provided with gender expertise.
  • In 2022, the Security Council held its first-ever formal meeting focusing on reprisals against women participating in peace and security processes.
  • In multilateral disarmament forums, wide gaps persist in women’s participation and women remain grossly underrepresented in many weapons-related fields, including technical arms control – only 12 percent of Ministers of Defense globally are women.
  • Countries where there are more women in legislative and executive branches of government have less defense spending and more social spending.

Conclusion

The International Day of Women in Diplomacy is an important opportunity to celebrate the progress that has been made in terms of gender equality in diplomacy and to reaffirm the commitment to achieving full gender equality in this field.

To watch the United Nations Commemorative Event to mark International Day of Women in Diplomacy 2024, click HERE. 

ePa Live: An East Coast Cannabis Pioneer & BK’s Favorite Haitian Son

Leave a reply

ePa Live Guests:

  • Jamila “Jay Mills” Hogan
  • Atibon Nazaire

Jay Mills is the founder of Ebony Green Society, she is a cannabis content creator, author, performing artist, community organizer and educator. She is the host of Pass The Jay Podcast. Jay is a cannabis industry pioneer. She is the first Black woman to manage a cultivation center on the east coast. She is the founder of The Green Life Learning Center, an international cannabis education company specializing in professional employee training standards for cannabis businesses. After some time in the herbal and holistic wellness industry and working at a DC medical dispensary she decided to focus on expanding her work, by creating opportunities for others and educating the community about the growing cannabis industry and all its uses. A powerful and deeply loved green leaf may just be the path to building generational wealth for Black folks, and Jay Mills wants to show you the way there.

To learn more about Jay Mills, her upcoming events and programs see info below:

Ebony Green | info@onlyebonygreen.com | 202.670.6867 | 712 H St. NE, Suite 1403 Washington, DC 20002 | IG @therealjaymills 

Jay Mills answers ePa Live: Question Of The Day

Jay Mills is a cannabis industry pioneer as the first Black woman to manage a cultivation center on the east coast.

Atibon Nazaire

Actor, Atibon Nazire 

Atibon is an award-winning actor and performer who lives in Brooklyn. His body of work includes films like FBI (2018), Fade to Black: The Trigger Effect (2013) Gabriel (2014), and Mountains. His passion for his Haitian culture and heritage led to the creation of Vodounchild and Brooklyn Loves Haiti merchandize you can purchase on Etsy. His new film, Mountain, is about a Haitian demolition worker who is faced with the realities of redevelopment as he is tasked with dismantling his rapidly gentrifying neighborhood.

Atibon Nazaire Answers ePa Live: Question Of The Day

Atibon Nazaire on his career as an actor and his new film, Mountain.

https://youtu.be/xLcgQxSXvNs

–