Posts tagged with "dawn"

ICC Investigating Biden Administration for Aiding Israeli War Crimes

Leave a reply

ICC Legal Action Against Biden: US Support for Israel Under Scrutiny

A US-based human rights group, Democracy for the Arab World Now (Dawn), has taken the unprecedented step of formally submitting a referral to the International Criminal Court (ICC) against President Joe Biden and other former US officials. The charges include complicity in Israeli war crimes and crimes against humanity in Gaza.

Need to Know:

  • Dawn, founded by the late journalist Jamal Khashoggi, is a human rights group that advocates for democracy and human rights in the Middle East and North Africa.
  • The ICC is an international court that prosecutes individuals for the most serious crimes of international concern, including genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity.
  • The US and Israel are not signatories to the Rome Statute, the treaty that established the ICC.
  • Dawn alleges that Biden, former Secretary of State Antony Blinken, former Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin, and other US officials are complicit in Israeli war crimes due to their continued support of Israel despite knowledge of its actions in Gaza.
  • The submission to the ICC argues that the actions of these US officials meet the legal standard for aiding and abetting under Article 25 of the ICC’s Rome Statute.

Takeaways:

  • The legal action taken by Dawn is significant because it challenges the US government’s support of Israel and its actions in Gaza.
  • The allegations made by Dawn raise serious questions about the legality of US foreign policy in the Middle East.
  • The ICC’s decision on whether to investigate the allegations could have major implications for US-Israel relations.
  • The move highlights the increasing scrutiny of US human rights practices and its foreign policy decisions.

Implications:

  • American Culture: This case could further divide public opinion on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the US’s role in it. It may also lead to increased awareness and discussion about international law and human rights.
  • American Society: The “Abandon Biden” movement shows that there is growing discontent with the president’s foreign policy, particularly among those who are critical of Israel’s actions in Gaza. This discontent could lead to further protests and activism.
  • American Foreign Policy: If the ICC decides to investigate the allegations against Biden and other US officials, it could have serious implications for US foreign policy. The US may be forced to reconsider its relationship with Israel and its approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. It could also strain relationships with other countries and international organizations.

Brief Background for ICC Legal Action:

The ICC is a permanent international criminal court with the jurisdiction to prosecute individuals for genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and the crime of aggression. It is based in The Hague, Netherlands. The ICC was established by the Rome Statute, which was adopted in 1998 and entered into force in 2002. The US is not a member of the ICC.

The legal action brought by Dawn is based on the principle of “complicity,” which means that even if a person does not directly commit a crime, they can still be held liable if they aid, abet, or otherwise assist in the commission of that crime. Dawn argues that by continuing to provide military and financial aid to Israel despite knowledge of its actions in Gaza, Biden and other US officials are complicit in Israeli war crimes and crimes against humanity.

Watch Democracy NOW! report on YouTube, “Biden, Blinken & Austin Accused of Complicity in Israel’s Gaza War Crimes; ICC Urged to Investigate,” HERE. 

Hopes for Harris Presidency Hinge on Concrete Policy Changes

Leave a reply

By Josh Paul

Former Director, U.S. Department of State.
Senior Advisor at DAWN, (DAWN; Founded by Jamal Khashoggi in 2018, DAWN promotes democracy & human rights in the Middle East and North Africa).
https://dawnmena.org/

When asked by media and allies I have expressed a belief that a Harris presidency would be “slightly better” than the Biden Presidency has been for Gaza, in part because she is not a hard-cast ideologue on this issue as Biden is, and in part because her team are more moderate and reasonable (and frankly also more thoughtful and self-aware) than Biden’s team are.

But the devil is in the details. When it comes to those details, it is hard to point to a specific area where we can be sure a Harris presidency would be better. Would they be more likely to condition or suspend arms transfers? They have been explicit that they would not. Would they enforce the U.S. laws already on the books, such as 620I or Leahy? They have not said they would. Would they stand up for the rights of peaceful protestors on campuses across America? They have given no sign of doing so, and indeed, Harris’ responses both to the protests at the time of Netanyahu’s visit to Washington DC, and to protests at her own campaign events, have been deeply disappointing – and their unwillingness to even give a Palestinian-American a voice at the Democratic Convention was a very worrying sign.

I also believe that no individual, not even at the level of the President of the United States, can bring transformative change to U.S. policy on this issue in the next four years given how firmly entrenched the current approach is across American politics – this is something that will take many years to fix, and in the coming weeks I will be unveiling a new effort to address this strategically, holistically, and effectively.

In the meantime, I, and others I have spoken to, would like to believe that Harris would be slightly better than where we are. But there is only so long we can wave our hands at generalities and presumptions – we need clear words from the Harris campaign that give a basis for these hopes. Without those, it is becoming increasingly difficult to hold to such hopes, and the polls demonstrate that the Harris campaign should be increasingly concerned about the implications of this gap between hopes and words – let alone actions – for outcomes of the election in key states.

The ball is in their, and her, court.

USAID Report: Gaza “Humanitarian Pier” A Costly and Ineffective Venture

Leave a reply

BY JOSH PAUL

Former Director, U.S. Department of State / Senior Advisor at DAWN / DAWN; Founded by Jamal Khashoggi in 2018, DAWN promotes democracy & human rights in the Middle East and North Africa. 

We all remember the fiasco that was the “humanitarian pier” (and the airdrops – what happened to those, by the way?).

Yesterday, the USAID Inspector General released their review of the pier, finding that this $230 million exercise “allowed for the delivery of aid in Gaza at a time when land routes were restricted, it operated for about 20 days and allowed delivery of enough assistance to feed only 450,000 people in Gaza.”

This is notable for several reasons, primary among which is the line that “and routes were restricted” – of course without adding “by Israel.” Under U.S. law (Section 620I of the Foreign Assistance Act) we are not permitted to provide any form of assistance, including military assistance, to a country that is restricting the delivery of US-funded humanitarian assistance. As if it had not been obvious for, frankly, many years (let alone the past 10+ months) that this was the case in Gaza, the USAID OIG report is further evidence from the lips of the U.S. Government that these restrictions exist. Every single day and every single dollar that funds the IDF’s capabilities is a violation of our laws.

You can read the entire OIG report HERE, including the finding that “multiple USAID staff expressed concerns that the focus on using JLOTS [the pier] would detract from the Agency’s advocacy to open land crossings in Israel and Egypt, which were seen as more efficient and proven avenues for delivering aid to Gaza.”