Posts tagged with "military state"

DoD Issues Directive For Use of Lethal Force Against Americans As Election Nears

The Department of Defense (DoD) recently issued Directive 5240.01, which outlines policies and procedures for DoD intelligence activities and their role in assisting law enforcement and other civil authorities. This directive has significant implications for how the DoD interacts with both domestic and international entities.

One key aspect of the directive is the clarification of when and how Defense Intelligence Components can provide assistance to law enforcement agencies. While the directive emphasizes cooperation and support, it also establishes clear guidelines and approval processes to ensure that such assistance is provided lawfully and with respect for the rights and privacy of U.S. persons.

The directive specifically addresses the use of force in these situations, stating that assistance involving the potential for lethal force requires approval from high-ranking officials, including the Secretary of Defense. This provision aims to ensure that the deployment of military personnel in domestic law enforcement situations is carefully considered and authorized only in exceptional circumstances.

Will Americans see U.S. troops, on U.S. soil, using lethal force against Americans?

The short answer is, not unlikely, however the directive makes clear that lethal force is an option. The DoD directive and other existing laws and policies, such as the Posse Comitatus Act, severely restrict the use of military personnel for domestic law enforcement. The directive emphasizes the importance of protecting civil liberties and using the least intrusive means possible. Lethal force would only be considered in extreme scenarios, such as responding to a major disaster or terrorist attack, and would require high-level authorization and oversight.

Dr. Ron Paul and Daniel McAdams discuss the concerning directive that grants authority for U.S. military forces to use lethal force on American soil under certain circumstances. They explore the implications of this directive, which was reissued just in time for the upcoming elections, and question whether the U.S. is heading toward a dangerous militarization of law enforcement.

Watch the Ron Paul Liberty Report on Youtube below:

Still, DoD officials insist the primary focus remains on external threats and national security. While the new directive allows for greater cooperation with civilian law enforcement agencies, it also reinforces the principle of civilian control of the military and the importance of safeguarding individual rights and freedoms.

The DoD directive defines intelligence-related activities as those that:

  • Train personnel to perform intelligence duties or activities: This could include specialized training programs for intelligence analysts, human intelligence collectors, or other intelligence professionals.
  • Conduct research, development, testing, and evaluation for the purpose of developing intelligence-specific capabilities: This encompasses activities aimed at creating new technologies or methods for intelligence gathering and analysis.
  • Conduct intelligence-related sensitive activities: These are activities that require special safeguards due to their sensitive nature, as outlined in DoDD 5143.01.

It’s important to note that these activities are distinct from intelligence activities conducted under the authority of Executive Order 12333. However, they are still subject to oversight and regulation to ensure they are conducted in a lawful and ethical manner. The DoD directive specifies that the use of lethal force, or assistance that could foreseeably lead to the use of lethal force, requires approval from high-ranking officials, including the Secretary of Defense. This includes scenarios like:

  • DoD response to chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and high-yield explosive incidents
  • Civil disturbances (which may also require Presidential authorization)
  • Assistance to civilian law enforcement where a confrontation is anticipated

The directive states it aims to ensure that such actions are carefully considered and authorized only in exceptional circumstances, emphasizing the importance of protecting civil liberties and using the least intrusive means possible. However, considering America’s fast track toward an over-militarized nation, including privacy intrusions of its citizens with secret technology and AI, the proof will be in the pudding like the writing on the wall.  

Key aspects of DoD Directive 5240.01 that impact intelligence activities and civilian support include:

  • Clear Guidelines for Providing Assistance to Law Enforcement: The directive clarifies when and how Defense Intelligence Components can assist law enforcement agencies, ensuring that such assistance is lawful and respects the rights and privacy of U.S. persons.
  • Approval Processes for Intelligence Assistance: The directive establishes approval processes for different types of intelligence assistance, with higher levels of approval required for assistance that could involve the use of lethal force.
  • Restrictions on Use of Force: The directive specifically addresses the use of force, emphasizing the importance of using the least intrusive means possible and requiring high-level authorization for assistance that could involve lethal force.
  • Protection of Civil Liberties: The directive emphasizes the DoD’s commitment to protecting civil liberties and individual rights, even in situations where they are providing assistance to civilian law enforcement.
  • Focus on External Threats: While the directive allows for greater cooperation with civilian law enforcement, it reinforces the DoD’s primary focus on external threats and national security.