Posts tagged with "congo"

A Cry from the Congo: The Origins of “Crimes Against Humanity” and Their Lasting Impact

In the late 19th century, a voice cried out from the heart of Africa, a voice that would unknowingly shape the language of international law and human rights for generations to come. That voice belonged to George Washington Williams, an American historian who, in 1890, used the phrase “crimes against humanity” to describe the brutal atrocities being committed in the Congo Free State under the rule of King Leopold II of Belgium.

Williams’s story is a powerful testament to the enduring struggle for human dignity and a stark reminder of the devastating consequences of unchecked power. It’s a story deeply intertwined with American history, offering a critical lens through which to examine our own nation’s evolving understanding of justice and responsibility.

A Witness to Atrocity

George Washington Williams was not just a historian; he was a witness. Commissioned by President Benjamin Harrison to investigate conditions in the Congo, Williams traveled to the region and documented the horrific abuses inflicted upon the Congolese people. In his “Open Letter to His Serene Majesty Leopold II,” he detailed the “deceit, fraud, robberies, arson, murder, slave-raiding, and general policy of cruelty” perpetrated by Leopold’s administration. It was in this damning indictment that the phrase “crimes against humanity” first appeared in such a context. 

The Birth of a Phrase, the Seeds of Change

While the concept of holding individuals accountable for large-scale atrocities existed before, Williams’s use of “crimes against humanity” marked a turning point. It gave a name to the unspeakable, a label that would eventually become a cornerstone of international criminal law. This phrase encapsulated the idea that certain acts are so heinous, so fundamentally offensive to human dignity, that they transcend national boundaries and constitute crimes against all of humanity.

Why This Matters Today

Williams’s story has profound significance for several reasons:

  • Historical Context: It sheds light on the brutal realities of colonialism and the devastating impact it had on African societies. Understanding this history is crucial for grappling with the ongoing legacies of colonialism and systemic racism.
  • Legal Significance: It highlights the evolution of international law and the slow but steady progress towards holding perpetrators of mass atrocities accountable. The term “crimes against humanity” is enshrined in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, serving as a powerful tool for seeking justice for victims.
  • American Relevance: As an American historian, Williams’s work compels us to examine our own nation’s role in global affairs. His willingness to confront injustice, even when it was politically inconvenient, serves as an inspiration. The fact that his initial cries largely went unheeded in the United States at the time underscores the need for continuous vigilance and advocacy for human rights.
  • A Timely Reminder: In a world still grappling with war crimes, genocide, and other mass atrocities, Williams’s work serves as a poignant reminder of the importance of bearing witness, speaking truth to power, and striving for a more just world.

Takeaways for Today’s Society

  • The Power of Words: Williams’s use of the term “crimes against humanity” illustrates the power of language to shape our understanding of the world and to inspire action.
  • The Importance of Bearing Witness: Williams’s firsthand account of the atrocities in the Congo is a powerful reminder of the importance of investigative journalism, human rights documentation, and personal testimonies in exposing injustice.
  • The Ongoing Struggle for Justice: The fight for human rights is an ongoing process. Williams’s story underscores the need for continued advocacy, activism, and international cooperation to prevent and punish crimes against humanity.

George Washington Williams’s legacy is not just one of historical significance. It is a call to action. It is a reminder that we all have a responsibility to stand up for human dignity and to prevent the recurrence of the horrors he witnessed. His cry from the Congo echoes through the ages, urging us to build a future where “crimes against humanity” are not just a phrase in a history book, but a relic of a dark and distant past.

Who Controls The Conversation At The Pub?

 

BY JEANETTE LENOIR

 

Recently, I stopped by a local pub to meet friends for drinks and conversation.  The evening went as usual; a lot of laughs and sharing of all kinds of stories. One particular story stood out to me and touched my heart deeply. I was profoundly saddened by a Reuters News report by Goran Tomasevic titled: Inside the Congo camp haunted by an unknown war. The conflict details the ethnic strife between Hema herders and Lendu farmers that’s partly blamed on the breakdown of the government there.

The report highlighted the story of two sisters. Their images are seared in my mind. The youngest bore a large scar across her face and her older sister is missing part of her arm. Their family and village were attacked by men wielding machetes. It’s a tragic story but one that must be told in my view as we work toward understanding the causes and impact of Man’s brutality toward Man. It seems like the world is on fire. As soon as we hear about a bombing in the Middle East, we’re faced with our own domestic terrorism. If some disturbed individual isn’t shooting up a school or mall, they’re shooting up a Waffle House or anywhere they can find soft targets; innocent people. It’s a lot to take. And sometimes it helps to talk to friends or family about these conflicts, which is what I was doing on this particular day at one of my favorite pubs. Earlier, I shared the images of the sisters on my Instagram account to help bring attention to the pain and suffering being felt by the most innocent among us all over the world; children. Mind you, this story comes on the heels of yet another chemical attack in Syria with children and babies among the victims. I feel helpless…

For me, talking about these tragic stories helps me deal with feeling powerless or simply to vent about it. And, that’s what I was doing sitting at the bar talking to the person next to me. We were sharing a conversation about the conflicts around the world when I brought up this particular story I read on Reuters. I took out my phone and showed him the images of the sisters. Although the conversation was between the two of us, the bartender overheard me talking about the conflict in DR Congo and walked over. I still had my phone in my hand with the image of the older sister on it. The image was a close up of her beautiful face with tears streaming down her cheeks. The bartender looked down across the bar and told me to put it away. He said he didn’t want me to show people the picture or continue to talk about what’s happening in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. With a look of shock on my face, I asked why. He replied, “I want to keep the conversation light here.” I responded by saying, “Why do you think you can tell people what they can or can’t talk about?” He said, “Because I’m the owner and I say what is or isn’t allowed in here.”

His response to a private conversation at a bar made me think about this issue deeper. Can a barkeep dictate what you can and can’t talk about? What discretion does a bartender use? Are people only supposed to talk about “lighthearted” topics at their local watering hole? I posed this question to another friend. And her perspective was similar to mine but she added the issue of a hate group attempting to recruit people sitting at a bar, or someone blatantly being racist. If a bartender hears this, is it their responsibility to stop it? What type of conversation is permitted at a bar? Are tragic news stories taboo topics when sipping an IPA? Are we not allowed to share images with our friends at a bar that are readily available on most major news sights that show all kinds of tragedies that tear at our heart strings? Who sets the tone of bar conversation if there is such a thing? And most importantly, who controls the conversation at the pub?