Posts tagged with "american culture"

The Unwavering Spirit of Benjamin Lay: A Quaker Dwarf’s Fight Against Slavery

Benjamin Lay, born into a Quaker family in England in 1682, was a man of small stature but towering moral courage. Despite having a form of dwarfism that caused spinal curvature and limited his height, Lay led a remarkably active life. He worked as a shepherd and glove maker, married a fellow Quaker named Sarah Smith in 1718, and later relocated to Barbados, where he ran a shop. It was in Barbados that Lay witnessed the horrors of the slave trade firsthand, an experience that ignited his lifelong passion for abolition.

For 25 years, Lay tirelessly campaigned against slavery, employing a variety of protest methods. One of his most dramatic acts was a 1738 demonstration at a Quaker meeting house, where he shocked attendees by spilling fake blood to symbolize the innocent lives lost to slavery. Lay’s unwavering stance against this brutal institution led to his disownment by Quaker communities on both sides of the Atlantic. However, this rejection did not deter him; he continued his activism, writing and distributing anti-slavery literature with unyielding determination.

Lay lived a simple life in a cave, remaining committed to his cause until his death in 1759. Remarkably, his passing occurred shortly after the Quakers finally decided to ban slave ownership, a testament to the impact of his tireless advocacy. In 2018, Quaker meetings from the UK and the US issued a joint statement acknowledging their historical error in disowning Lay and recognizing his extraordinary integrity and courage in the fight against slavery.

Lay’s activism was characterized by a fiery passion and an unwavering commitment to his principles. Unlike some of his contemporaries who advocated for gradual abolition, Lay demanded the immediate and unconditional emancipation of all enslaved Africans. He didn’t just speak out against slavery; he embodied his beliefs, refusing to consume any products of slave labor and even making his own clothes to avoid supporting the exploitative system.

One of Lay’s most striking tactics was his use of guerrilla theater to expose the evils of slavery. He would disrupt Quaker meetings, stage dramatic protests, and even splatter “blood” on slaveholders to highlight the moral stain of their actions. These actions shocked and outraged many, but they also forced people to confront the issue in a way they couldn’t ignore, sparking conversations and debates about the morality of slavery.

Compared to other abolitionists like William Lloyd Garrison and Frederick Douglass, Lay’s approach was more confrontational and less reliant on intellectual arguments. While Garrison and Douglass used their powerful oratory and writing to sway public opinion, Lay’s activism was more visceral and emotional, appealing directly to people’s consciences and their sense of moral outrage.

Lay’s resistance, while not always appreciated in his own time, helped shape American culture in several ways. His uncompromising stance on slavery helped pave the way for the abolitionist movement, inspiring others to take a stand. His willingness to challenge authority and disrupt the status quo inspired future generations of activists to question societal norms and fight for justice. And his example of living according to his principles, even when it was difficult or unpopular, is a timeless lesson in moral courage.

Benjamin Lay may have been a small man in stature, but his spirit was giant. His fearless activism helped lay the groundwork for the end of slavery in America, and his legacy continues to inspire those who fight for justice and equality today.

Lay’s resistance had a significant impact on American culture by:

  • Paving the way for the abolitionist movement: His uncompromising stance on the immediate and unconditional emancipation of slaves challenged the gradual approach of many of his contemporaries and helped set the stage for the growing abolitionist movement.
  • Inspiring future generations of activists: Lay’s willingness to challenge authority and disrupt the status quo through dramatic protests and confrontations served as a model for future activists seeking to effect social change.
  • Providing a timeless lesson in moral courage: Lay’s commitment to living in accordance with his principles, even when it was difficult or unpopular, demonstrated the importance of moral courage and conviction in the face of injustice.

The Mulford Act: How the Black Panthers’ Fight for Gun Rights Shaped American Gun Control

In the annals of American history, the Black Panther Party stands as a symbol of resistance and the fight for racial equality. While their efforts to combat police brutality and advocate for self-defense are well-documented, their significant role in shaping the complex landscape of gun control in the United States is often overlooked. In the late 1960s, the Black Panthers leveraged California’s open-carry laws to monitor police activity in Black neighborhoods, a practice that would trigger a chain of events leading to stricter gun control measures, ironically with the initial support of the National Rifle Association (NRA).

The catalyst for this shift was the Mulford Act, a 1967 California law that banned the open carry of loaded firearms in public. The bill was a direct response to the Black Panthers’ armed patrols, which alarmed many, including then-Governor Ronald Reagan, who signed the Mulford Act into law.

The NRA’s support for the Mulford Act marked a turning point in the organization’s history. It was a rare instance of the NRA backing gun restrictions, driven by a fear of armed Black activists. This alliance, however, was short-lived. As gun control measures expanded nationwide, the NRA reversed its stance, adopting the staunch pro-gun position that has dominated its agenda ever since.

The Black Panthers’ legacy in this narrative is complex. Their armed resistance, while controversial, highlighted the racial disparities in the application of gun laws and sparked a national debate on the Second Amendment. It also inadvertently contributed to the tightening of gun control, which disproportionately affected the Black community.

Today, the Mulford Act serves as a reminder of the intricate interplay between race, politics, and gun control in America. It is a cautionary tale of how fear and prejudice can drive policy decisions, with lasting implications for individual rights and public safety. The Black Panthers’ struggle for gun rights, while ultimately unsuccessful in the short term, left an indelible mark on American culture, shaping the ongoing debate on gun control and the Second Amendment. As we grapple with these issues today, it is crucial to remember this history and its lessons, striving for a future where gun laws are equitable, just, and respectful of individual liberties.

The NRA’s stance on gun control underwent a significant evolution in response to the Black Panther Party’s activism. Initially, the NRA supported the Mulford Act, which restricted open carry laws in California, due to fear and prejudice towards armed Black activists. This marked a rare instance of the NRA backing gun control measures. However, as gun control laws expanded nationwide, the NRA reversed its position, adopting a staunch pro-gun stance in opposition to any form of gun regulation. This shift was partly driven by a growing fear among rural white conservatives of potential restrictions on their own gun rights, fueled by the implementation of gun control laws targeting groups like the Black Panthers. In essence, the Black Panther’s activism, while initially prompting the NRA to support gun control, inadvertently contributed to the organization’s later staunch opposition to any gun regulation.

The Mulford Act had a direct and profound impact on the Black Panther Party. By banning the open carry of loaded firearms in public, the Mulford Act effectively dismantled the Party’s “police patrols,” hindering their ability to challenge police brutality and assert their Second Amendment rights. This act of legislation also made it illegal to carry loaded firearms in the state Capitol building, further restricting the Party’s ability to advocate for their cause.

The Black Panthers’ “police patrols” were motivated by their desire to monitor police activity in Black neighborhoods and to protect residents from police brutality. They aimed to empower the Black community by informing individuals of their rights during police encounters and ensuring that those rights were not violated.

The Mulford Act had several significant and lasting impacts on American culture:

  • Shifted the NRA’s Stance: It marked a rare instance where the NRA supported gun restrictions, revealing how racial anxieties could influence gun policy. However, this support ultimately backfired, contributing to the NRA’s later staunch opposition to any gun control measures.
  • Fueled National Gun Control Debate: The Black Panthers’ armed protests and the subsequent Mulford Act brought the issue of gun control and the Second Amendment into the national spotlight, intensifying debates around gun rights and racial justice.
  • Highlighted Racial Disparities: The Act exposed the racial disparities in the application of gun laws and how they could be used to target specific communities, raising awareness of systemic inequalities.
  • Impacted Public Perception of Gun Ownership: The image of armed Black Panthers patrolling streets challenged prevailing notions of gun ownership, contributing to a more complex and nuanced understanding of the issue.
  • Set Precedent for Future Legislation: The Mulford Act paved the way for stricter gun control measures nationwide, demonstrating how a single anti-Black law could have far-reaching consequences.

Gun rights, as evidenced in the Second Amendment, were never enacted to include Black Americans. Carol Anderson’s book “The Second” examines the historical and ongoing impact of the Second Amendment on African Americans. It argues that the Second Amendment has been used to maintain their powerlessness and vulnerability, from slavery to the present day. Anderson reveals how the right to bear arms has been weaponized against African Americans and highlights the deep connection between the Second Amendment and anti-Blackness. The book aims to reshape the conversation on gun rights by exposing the historical context of racial injustice.

Overall, the Mulford Act played a pivotal role in shaping American gun culture, highlighting the intersection of race, politics, and the Second Amendment. It serves as a reminder of how fear and prejudice can drive policy decisions, with lasting implications for individual rights and public safety.

The Ghost of George Armwood: A Lynching History in America’s Racial Landscape

The horrific lynching of George Armwood on October 18, 1933, by a white mob in Princess Anne, Maryland, is a chilling reminder of America’s dark history of racial violence. This brutal act, where Mr. Armwood was beaten, hanged, dragged, and burned, was not merely a singular act of hate but a reflection of the deep-seated racial prejudice and inequality that plagued the nation.

This heinous crime sparked national outrage and calls for justice, yet the subsequent investigations and trials were marred by obstruction, intimidation, and ultimately, impunity for the perpetrators. The failure to hold anyone accountable for Mr. Armwood’s murder underscored the systemic racism that permeated the legal system and society at large.

The Armwood lynching is a stark illustration of how racial terror was used to maintain white supremacy and control Black communities. It also highlights the complicity of the broader community, where thousands participated in or witnessed the lynching without intervention.

This event had a profound impact on American race relations, further deepening the divide between Black and white Americans. It fueled the Civil Rights Movement, as African Americans demanded an end to racial violence and equal protection under the law. The legacy of this lynching and countless others continues to shape discussions around race, justice, and equality in America today.

The George Armwood lynching serves as a somber reminder of the work that remains to be done to address the systemic racism that still plagues our nation. It is a call to remember the victims of racial violence and to strive for a more just and equitable society for all.

The failure of the justice system to punish the perpetrators of the George Armwood lynching added to the racial divide in America in several ways:

Reinforced white supremacy: It sent a clear message that Black lives were not valued equally and that white people could commit acts of violence against Black people with impunity. This reinforced the existing power structure and made Black people feel unsafe and vulnerable.

Eroded trust in the legal system: Black people saw that the justice system was not designed to protect them. This led to a deep distrust of the legal system and a sense that they could not expect fair treatment.

Fueled anger and resentment: The lack of justice for Mr. Armwood and countless other victims of racial violence fueled anger and resentment among Black communities. This anger and resentment contributed to the Civil Rights Movement and other forms of resistance against racial injustice.

Perpetuated racial stereotypes: The lynching reinforced the negative stereotype of Black men as criminals and rapists. This stereotype was used to justify further violence and discrimination against Black people.

Created a climate of fear: The lynching created a climate of fear and intimidation in Black communities. This fear made it difficult for Black people to speak out against racial injustice and to demand their rights.

The impact of the justice system’s failure to punish the perpetrators of the George Armwood lynching continues to be felt today. The racial divide in America is still very real, and the legacy of this and other lynchings continues to shape race relations and policy.

Here are some additional points to consider:

  • The lynching of George Armwood was not an isolated incident. It was part of a larger pattern of racial violence that plagued the United States throughout the 19th and 20th centuries.
  • The failure to hold anyone accountable for Mr. Armwood’s murder was a reflection of the systemic racism that permeated the legal system and society at large.
  • The legacy of this lynching and countless others continues to shape discussions around race, justice, and equality in America today.

Phil Donahue, Pioneering American Talk Show Host, Dies at 88

Phil Donahue, the iconic talk show host who revolutionized daytime television, has passed away at the age of 88. Donahue, known for his groundbreaking approach to interviewing and audience engagement, leaves behind a legacy that spans nearly three decades.

Donahue’s show, which aired for 29 years, was a pioneer in the talk show format. He was one of the first hosts to welcome audience participation, often allowing guests to ask questions directly to his interviewees. This interactive approach, combined with Donahue’s willingness to tackle controversial topics, made his show a must-watch for millions of viewers.

Throughout his career, Donahue interviewed a wide range of guests, from celebrities and politicians to everyday people with extraordinary stories. He was known for his ability to connect with his audience and create a space for open and honest dialogue.

Donahue’s impact on television cannot be overstated. He paved the way for future generations of talk show hosts and helped to shape the medium into what it is today. His death is a loss for the entertainment industry, American culture and for all those who were touched by his work.

The Cyclical Nature of Political Assassinations in America

 

Political assassinations have been a recurring feature in American history, often shaping the course of the nation. From presidents to civil rights leaders, these targeted killings have left a lasting impact.

In 1865, President Abraham Lincoln was assassinated by John Wilkes Booth, a Confederate sympathizer. This event shocked the nation and had far-reaching consequences for Reconstruction and the future of race relations in America. Decades later, in 1963, President John F. Kennedy was assassinated by Lee Harvey Oswald in Dallas, Texas. The assassination led to widespread grief and conspiracy theories that persist to this day.

Civil rights leaders were also targets of political assassinations. In 1965, Malcolm X was assassinated by members of the Nation of Islam, and in 1968, Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated by James Earl Ray. These killings were a major setback for the civil rights movement and highlighted the deep racial divisions in American society.

What were the motives behind the assassination of Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr.?

The motives behind the assassinations of Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr. were complex and multifaceted.

In the case of Malcolm X, his assassination, with alleged covert government assistance, was carried out by members of the Nation of Islam, a group he had once been a prominent member of. However, he had become increasingly critical of the Nation and its leader, Elijah Muhammad, in the years leading up to his death. His criticisms and his formation of a rival organization, the Organization of Afro-American Unity, are believed to have been key factors in the decision to assassinate him.

The assassination of Martin Luther King Jr. was carried out by James Earl Ray, a white supremacist. Ray had a history of racism and criminal activity. While his exact motives remain somewhat unclear, it is widely believed that his hatred of King and the civil rights movement played a significant role in his decision to commit the assassination.

In both cases, the assassinations were driven by a combination of political, ideological, and personal factors. They were acts of violence that had a profound impact on the civil rights movement and American society as a whole.

More recently, there have been attempts on the lives of other political figures. In 2011, Congresswoman Gabby Giffords was shot in the head during a constituent event in Tucson, Arizona. She survived but was left with severe injuries. And in 2024, former President Donald Trump was reportedly shot at by a sniper during a campaign rally in Pennsylvania. He was not injured, but the incident underscored the ongoing threat of political violence.

And these are just a few examples of the many political assassinations that have taken place in America. These events have had a profound impact on the nation, shaping its history and its politics. It is important to remember these events and to learn from them, so that we can work to prevent future acts of political violence, like the recent assassination attempt of Republican nominee for president, well known for his own incitement of political violence, former president Donald Trump who survived a snipers bullets that nearly ending his life. The shooting at Trump’s rally in Butler, Pennsylvania took the life of one rally attendee and wounded several others.  

Here are a few other attempted assassinations and assassinations of U.S. presidents in American history:

  • James Garfield: Wounded July 2, 1881, he died 79 days later
  • William McKinley: Wounded September 6, 1901, he died 8 days later
  • Theodore Roosevelt: Attempted assassination on Oct 14, 1912
  • Andrew Jackson: Attempted assassination Jan. 30, 1835 outside the Capitol Building
  • William Howard Taft: Attempted assassination alleged in 1909 and 1910
  • Herbert Hoover: Attempted assassination alleged in 1928
  • Franklin D. Roosevelt: Attempted assassination Feb 15, 1933
  • Harry S. Truman: Attempted assassination in 1947 during the Jewish insurgency in Palestine before the formation of the State of Israel, and November 1, 1950, Puerto Rican pro-independence activists
  • Richard Nixon: Attempted assassination on April 13, 1972 and on February 22, 1974
  • Gerald Ford: Attempted assassination August 1974; September 5, 1975; September 22, 1975
  • Jimmy Carter: Alleged attempted assassination May 5, 1979

Prince’s Purple Rain Film Turns 40: A Cultural Retrospective

Released in 1984, Prince’s iconic film Purple Rain turned 40 this year. The movie was a critical and commercial success, grossing over $68 million worldwide and spawning several hit singles, including the title track, “When Doves Cry,” and “Let’s Go Crazy.”

Beyond its commercial success, Purple Rain had a profound impact on American popular culture. The film’s innovative use of music, fashion, and visual imagery made it a groundbreaking work of art that continues to inspire and influence artists and filmmakers today.

Cultural Significance

Music:

Purple Rain’s soundtrack is considered one of the greatest albums of all time. The film’s music helped to popularize the Minneapolis sound, a unique blend of funk, rock, and R&B that would go on to influence a generation of musicians. Artists like Janet Jackson, Madonna, and Michael Jackson all cite Purple Rain as a major influence on their own work.

Fashion:

Prince’s unique and flamboyant style, as seen in the film, became a major fashion influence in the 1980s and beyond. His signature look, which often included ruffled shirts, tight pants, and high heels, was imitated by fans around the world. Prince’s fashion sense continues to inspire designers and fashion icons today.

Visual Imagery:

Purple Rain’s striking visuals, directed by Albert Magnoli, have been praised for their artistry and originality. The film’s iconic scenes, such as the motorcycle ride and the concert finale, have become ingrained in pop culture. Purple Rain’s visuals have been referenced in countless movies, TV shows, and music videos over the years.

Legacy:

Purple Rain’s cultural impact can be seen in the work of numerous artists, including Madonna, Michael Jackson, and Beyoncé. The film has also been referenced in countless movies, TV shows, and music videos. In 2019, Purple Rain was inducted into the National Film Registry by the Library of Congress, deeming it “culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant.”

Purple Rain’s 40th anniversary is a testament to its enduring power and influence. The film remains a beloved classic that continues to resonate with audiences around the world.

“Purple Rain” had a tremendous influence on the music of its time and the music of the future. It launched the Minneapolis Sound and propelled the careers of the artists who performed with and were produced by Prince (most notably André Cymone, Dez Dickerson, Wendy & Lisa, Brownmark, Bobby Z. Dr. Fink, Morris Day, Jimmy Jam and Terry Lewis, Jesse Johnson, Jellybean Johnson, Monte Moir, Jerome Benton, St. Paul Peterson, Susannah Melvoin, Jill Jones, Sheila E., and Eric Leeds). Pop/rock artists including Sheena Easton and the Bangles both had hits with songs Prince wrote during the “Purple Rain” sessions. Decades later, “Purple Rain” influenced a new generation of musicians and performers including Alicia Keys, Questlove, D’Angelo, Beyoncé, Rihanna, Bruno Mars, and Janelle Monae.

Refusing to be pigeonholed by critics and the music industry, Prince continued to explore jazz, classical, gospel, blues, Latin, and rap music while furthering the boundaries of rock, pop, R&B, and funk right up until his transition to the afterworld in 2016. – Eddie Santiago

Will Black Entertainment Television Be Black-Owned Again?

It appears Paramount Global has had a change of heart regarding the sale of BET. In August 2023, the entertainment company announced that it had ended its plan to sell a majority stake in BET Media Group, which ​​includes the BET channel, BET+, VH1, and BET Studios, as previously shared by AFROTECH. The reasoning for the change of plans was that “a sale wouldn’t result in any meaningful deleveraging of its balance sheet.” However, on Dec. 20, Bloomberg reported that Paramount Global is in talks to sell BET to a management-led investor group. Among the potential bidders is Byron Allen, founder and CEO of Allen Media Group, who previously showed interest.

The media mogul has returned with a new offer as he pursues making the network Black-owned again. According to Bloomberg, Allen has placed an offer of $3.5 billion. The outlet also details that during his initial bid, he collaborated with four banks and two private equity firms to make a $3 billion offer.

“You are pursuing an inside sale at a below-market price with management that will not yield the highest price for the stockholders,” Allen wrote in an email to Paramount Global’s management and board, per the outlet. “We believe it would be an egregious breach of fiduciary duty by the Paramount Global management team and board of directors if BET is sold for anything less than the highest price, particularly, in order to provide a sweetheart deal to an insider at the expense of public shareholders.”

Allen’s letter comes after Tyler Perry described the previous bidding process as “disrespectful,” AFROTECH mentioned in October 2023.

Perry reportedly placed a bid of $2 billion at the time. “Don’t try to get me to pay for something that’s not worth anywhere near the value,” he said during Bloomberg’s Equality Summit, according to The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. While Perry seems to have walked away from further pursuing BET, Allen has kept himself in the race. Other potential buyers that have been named are Scott Mills, CEO of BET, and CC Capital Partners Founder Chinh Chu.

Original Report by AFROTECH

 

 

 

Op-ed: Embracing A Culture That Cherishes Traditional American Values

 

Editor’s Note: The opinions expressed are solely of the writer. Warren Smith received his bachelor’s and master’s degrees at BYU, a doctorate in technology strategy from the Harvard Business School and currently owns JETS: Japanese-English Technology Services in Durham, New Hampshire. He wrote this piece for the Deserter News. 

 

 

While I agree wholeheartedly with Dr. John Armstrong that we must find a kind of patriotism that permits goodwill toward all people, I worry that this op-ed misses the point entirely about what “nationalism” is and is not (“Patriotism vs. nationalism in a Mormon context,” Oct. 10).

While Latter-day Saint teachings caution us against “nationalism” in terms of narrow-minded and ignorant tribalism, which is nothing more than an “us-versus-them” high school rivalry on an international level, it would be equally wrong to ignore the realities of America’s exceptional contribution to the world in terms of systems and technologies that have lifted untold millions (billions?) from literal starvation and abject poverty into relative well-being, and wrong to ignore the fact that the American impact on the world has been a reflection of our historic “American culture” where “culture” is defined as a predominant set of shared values and not superficial cultural markers such as tastes in food and entertainment, etc.

Space does not permit me to define the key aspects of the historical “American culture,” but it is what has enabled America to feed the world, create industry and infrastructure in nations around the globe, and to become by far the world’s largest humanitarian contributor as well.

It must be noted that even the oft-condemned American pseudo-Colonialism has resulted in the creation of infrastructures and systems that set the foundation for the success of many countries in post-Colonial independence, and this has been ultimately a blessing for the very countries that some would argue have been “exploited” by the American system.

Is it toxic “nationalism” to believe that America has (had?) a culture that is superior to most, or perhaps all, other cultures? Before that question can be answered, we must first ask whether it is possible for one culture to be better than another. The easiest way to address this is to ask if there such a thing as a “sick culture.” The answer is a resounding “yes.” The most cursory reading of scripture shows how cultures — not “races” or “nations” — can go through cultural changes that bring misery, where repentance — as a society — brings joy.

Much closer to home, any sociologist who dares can point to subcultures — and I do not mean races or classes — that are statistically characterized by chronic poverty, disregard for education, willing dependency on public assistance, rejection of parental responsibilities, involvement in crime (with concomitant incarceration), embracing of an exploitive drug culture, hatred of law-enforcement, perceived victimhood, vilification of others, and the like. Clearly, such a self-reinforcing set of values is a “sick culture.”

I am not arguing that a traditional Fourth of July celebration is in any way superior to, say, a French Bastille Day celebration, nor that hamburgers are superior to dim sum. On the contrary, these are merely superficial preferences. But there is a set of values that have defined, traditionally, the “American culture,” a set of values that is under extreme attack at present — values such as preferring liberty over security, embracing traditional virtues, belief in the market system, taking responsibility for one’s self and responsibility to care for friends and neighbors personally and not leaving it to the government, commitment to family values, freedom to succeed or fail, etc.

While, of course, in some form or other these values are found in other countries and cultures as well, if a rejection of “nationalism” somehow maps to a rejection of the traditional American culture — and value system — and, perhaps more to the point, of the responsibility that America has borne for the last 70 years in leading the world in lifting people out of hunger and poverty through being a beacon of industry, democracy, and free market competition, then this rejection is a decidedly bad thing.

While I completely agree that any definition of “nationalism” that involves hatred or dehumanizing of individuals of other nations or cultures is fundamentally wrong, I wholeheartedly embrace the view of “nationalism” (which is rightly called “patriotism”) that cherishes the American culture, acknowledges the unique role America has played – and must continue to play – as a force for good in world history. It would be tragic to abandon this “nationalism,” or patriotism, just because there are also some individuals (such as in Charlottesville) who embrace “nationalism” out of hatred or ignorance.

The bottom line is, despite the existence of hateful and ignorant people, for those people who can rise above petty enmity, embracing positive “nationalism” is a decidedly good thing, and I call upon all Americans to defend the values that have made this country great, and invite all people, American or not, to share in our traditional American values.

 

NABJ New Orleans: A Significant Moment In America’s Journey In A City Full Of Culture And Black History

 

BY JEANETTE LENOIR

 

New Orleans can easily be described as America’s secret gem. Despite the havoc caused by Hurricane Katrina and the negative portrayal of a city plagued by violence, New Orleans stands alone in all its glory, people, culture and revelry.

This year, the National Association of Black Journalists congregated in the historic city, part of the group’s annual convention and career fair. America’s racial turmoil, like the most recent incident in Charlottesville, VA, makes the destination for the gathering a unique one that highlights who we are, what we’re capable of and what we continue to stand for as Americans and NABJ members. The struggle for equality and a more just country isn’t over but neither is our resolve and determination to fight bigotry with education, success and the most powerful armor man has against hate; Love. And, New Orleans has plenty of love, history and black culture for the greater mission to improve our world and American culture as a whole.

The Big Easy, as the iconic and beautiful city is nicknamed, was the perfect complement to highlight NABJ’s work and the people that come out to support it. People like, Roland S. Martin, Charles Barkley, Harris Faulkner, Dr. Jeff Gardere, Nyja Greene with CNN in Atlanta, Tracey Rivers with Fox 26 News in Houston, and many other prominent black figures. And, even the presence of arguably the most unpopular black woman in the White House, Omarosa Manigault, couldn’t overshadow the power of the event in a city full of life, talent, charm and charisma. And, how fitting and telling of the group’s importance, growth and impact that even Facebook joined the convention this year to recruit talent for its own innovative work across the globe.

In our current state of aggressive and divisive nationalism, New Orleans was the perfect backdrop to mark black progress in America. Black folks, specifically those that call the Big Easy home, have come a long way as a people. In the repugnant face of racism and discrimination, to a natural disaster that changed the lives and demographics of the city; New Orleanians are overcoming everything that has plagued their journey with music, food, revelry, an organic entrepreneurial spirit and a potent dose of American culture. Nevertheless, it’s clear to see, especially thanks to an administration fueling anti-American values that the civil rights movement is far from over, making NABJ’s mission and work more important than ever.

Jazz or Jass as it was first spelled, was born in New Orleans, making dancing and singing in the streets to great local bands simply a cultural norm. From Bourbon Street to Frenchman Street, the city cradles its patrons like moths uncontrollably drawn to light, despite all the effects that comes with merrymaking, and an alcohol and drugs infused atmosphere. However, there’s more than the music and revelry to talk about. The local artists on the streets hawking their goods like, Alex Lee Calacuayo, add a certain essence to the bright beautiful colors that is New Orleans and its people. Food venders, like Mr. Joe’s Island Grill—unlike some other cities in America—take a great deal of pride in what they prepare and offer. It’s a constant party that hits you all over, from your dancing feet to your mouth full of the best food on the planet. And, none of it takes away from the cultural significance that is New Orleans.

A significant perspective of NABJ’s presence in the Big Easy is the story of Palmer Park, which according to, New Orleans Historical, was named after a staunch supporter of slavery and segregation; Benjamin Parker. The white’s only park was the scene where during the Jim Crow era, during a 1924 speech, “Shreveport Mayor Lee E. Thomas, challenging Senator Randsell for his seat, drew loud applause when he accused the senator of signing a letter supporting a black man for a federal job; the mayor’s allegation sought to condemn the senator’s egalitarian gesture. Similar racism could be seen in reaction to a 1934 incident. Residents nearby the park and civic organizations complained about an unlicensed shoe shine stand, “Sam’s Shine Parlor,” which appeared in the park. The stand, aimed at people waiting nearby for the bus to Kenner, was originally chained to a tree in the park. The black vendor’s chair was removed. White vendors, like the man who sold hot tamales, were allowed in the park.”

Despite a long and arduous journey plagued with racial prejudice black people in America are still standing, and still working towards their own prosperity as our collective American values instills in each and every one of us. And how fitting that after all these years and racial turmoil’s, NABJ is still working to bring organizations together that recognize the importance and value of diversity in the work place, especially in media. We represent the spirit of Sam’s Shine Parlor.

The country is changing. New Orleans is going through it too, especially following the mass public upheaval brought on by Katrina. Walking the streets of the city you can still hear folks talk about all they’ve lost during the August 2005 storm. The breaking of the levees didn’t just spill massive amounts of water covering the city and destroying lives. Some argue that it also washed away a great deal of its culture and fast-tracking gentrification. Even so, the city full of charm with one of the best American accents you’ll hear is still thriving. And a large reason for it lies at the feet of the local population that make a living in the streets, where a great deal of the city’s booming tourism industry can be seen and deeply felt. New Orleans is not just beautiful; the Big Easy is the epitome of what we recognize as the birth of American culture.

 

Defining American Culture And Identity

By JEANETTE LENOIR

 

America is one of the most diverse countries in the world, making defining American culture a difficult task to undertake. Considering the many traditions Americans from all walks of life adhere to, pass down, recognize and celebrate, one would be hard pressed to capture all that she encompasses and constitutes. Nevertheless, the University of Michigan took on the challenge and came up with 101 characteristics that define American culture.

The “Melting Pot” has been a fitting description for as long as the question of her identity has been pondered, but thanks to the break down, specifics have been added to our cultural description. Since her independence 241 years ago, America has steadily evolved into a more perfect union representative of the many facets of the world.  People from all walks of life can adequately represent what it means to be an American.

As the world turns, including our own democracy, we decided to post this question to various Americans in New York City and other parts of the state: How do you describe American culture? As you’ll see, the question wasn’t easily answered…

 

,